IT was the moment Flashman finally cracked.
PMQs was going nicely with Labour bulldog Ed Balls snapping at the PM's heels, when a quip was too much for the shiny-faced premier.
Mentioning Britain's hard-won credibility on the back of the Coalition's cuts, Dave snipped as Ed bit hard into the Tory toff's ankle: "Which we wouldn't have if we listened to the muttering idiot sitting opposite me."
There was a loud roar but it was difficult to discern which side was shouting the louder.
It was tweeted that Mr B had unnerved the PM by urging him to "chillax, have another glass of wine" – a reference to the recent revelation that our noble leader unwinds with a game of tennis, a glass of wine and a spot of karaoke.
For his part, the Shadow Chancellor later noted how he had simply goaded the PM by urging him to "tell us about the recession".
As the Commons roar subsided Speaker Bercow – another parliamentarian Flashman holds in low esteem – pointed out how the word idiot was unparliamentary and asked Dave to withdraw it.
Flashman duly obliged saying he would replace it with the words "the man who left us with this enormous deficit and this financial crisis".
Of course, this is not the first time the Tory toff has vented his spleen.
Among his memorable barbs was telling Labour frontbencher Angela Eagle to "calm down dear", describing Tory backbencher Nadine Dorries as "extremely frustrated" and branding Labour veteran Dennis Skinner a "dinosaur".
Previously, the PM has likened the muttering Mr Balls as like "having someone with Tourette's sitting opposite you", a remark he later apologised for.
Later, Flashman was again in apologetic mode when he said sorry to the Beast of Bolsover for likening him to a brontosaurus and insisted he really regarded him as a "tremendous ornament to this House" – like grandma's cracked old aspidistra perhaps?
Lord Lamont, the former Tory Chancellor – whom Dave worked for all those years ago on Black Wednesday – noted: "He can be quite volatile - That makes him more engaging."
Volatility? Prime Minister? Surely not?
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article