In recent years, the debate around green finance has been highly polarised. For some, it’s a game-changer for nature restoration; for others, it’s little more than greenwashing or the commercialisation of nature.
At Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park Authority, we’ve been working for years now to untangle this complex issue. What we've found is that the truth lies somewhere between these extremes, and a more thoughtful, balanced approach is what’s needed: one that looks beyond the headlines and polarised discourse.
So why, you may ask, is a National Park Authority getting involved in such a divisive topic? Granted, we have no financial regulatory powers, nor are we here to tell landowners or businesses how to manage their finances. But we do have a clear role as a convener and facilitator for the National Park and for promoting nature restoration within it. What is certain is the urgency, and our commitment to delivering large-scale environmental recovery at pace.
While the figures may be debated, one thing is clear: achieving our ambitious nature restoration goals will require a dramatic increase in funding,both in scale and long-term predictability. Public funds alone won’t be enough. That's why it’s essential to explore innovative financial mechanisms, whether voluntary or mandated, that allow the private sector to contribute to protecting and restoring the ecosystems they benefit from. This is not just appropriate, it’s necessary.
We believe that a combination of public and private finance is key to meeting Scotland’s restoration targets. Green finance has the potential to be a central part of this, but it must be approached carefully. Every project needs to be designed to create tangible, lasting benefits. Yes, there are risks, and we must stay vigilant to avoid falling into the trap of schemes which are unethical and inefficient.
With COP29 focusing on finance for climate action, and Scotland’s Natural Capital Market Framework now in place, it’s clear that diversifying funding sources is crucial. These national and global initiatives, along with local efforts like the Scottish Land Commission’s new guidance on natural resource governance, send a clear message: green finance must be ethical, accessible, and informed by the needs of local communities. Everyone has a part to play in making this a reality.
As such, we have launched new guidance for projects in the National Park, designed to help landowners, developers, and communities navigate this space. With this guidance, we are playing our part in encouraging all parties to consider the risks and opportunities that green finance projects may bring, including biodiversity, climate resilience, food supply, water management, and community engagement. We believe that this promotes an integrated, proportionate approach.
Green finance isn’t a magic bullet. It’s not a one-size-fits-all solution. Done right, it has the potential to deliver environmental, social, and economic outcomes that are sustainable and fair. But it must also support local communities, ensuring they reap the benefits of restoration alongside the environment. It is only by working together, can we ensure it’s done in a way that benefits both nature and people.
For those within the National Park considering a green finance project, we encourage you to use our guidance and reach out for advice on maximising outcomes for both nature and people.
Simon Jones is Director of Environment & Visitor Services, Loch Lomond & The Trossachs National Park Authority
Agenda is a column for outside contributors. Contact: agenda@theherald.co.uk
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here