There have been several U-turns by the Scottish Government recently, notably on juryless rape trials and the proposed ban on woodburning stoves in new-builds.
Today, one of our readers argues that the SNP badly needs Mr Flynn – and several other MPs and ex-MPs – in Holyrood to reinvigorate a flagging independence campaign,
Today, one of our readers argues that the SNP badly needs Mr Flynn – and several other MPs and ex-MPs – in Holyrood to reinvigorate a flagging independence campaign,
Stan Grodynski of Longniddry writes:
"Stephen Flynn’s decision to seek to be elected as the SNP candidate for the Aberdeen South and North Kincardine constituency at the next Scottish Election has caused much debate, not all of it edifying. For a start, should he be successful and also decide to continue to represent Aberdeen South as an MSP, it would be misleading to describe that as 'double-jobbing' as much of his constituency work would overlap, as would parliamentarygovernmental information provision.
While it is understandable that Audrey Nicoll and other current MSPs who are working hard on behalf of their constituents are concerned about apparently inexplicit current SNP internal processes, the fact is that every one of Scotland's SNP MSPs, in spite of disingenuous claims by opposition MSPs, could have done more to advance self-determination and the cause of independence.
To my knowledge we have not had many, if any, local conventions on the way forward for Scotland that would stimulate wider debate on Scotland's constitutional future, never mind a national Civic Convention, and I have seen little in local newspapers or on billboards proclaiming the Scottish solution to Broken Brexit Britain which is Scotland’s independence.
Sign up and get our Letter of the Day straight to your inbox.
Instead Nigel Farage and Reform, backed by those who helped to mis-sell Brexit, are proclaiming at every opportunity that the answer to all of Britain’s problems is to substantially reduce immigration while knowing that such a policy would do significantly more damage to the Scottish economy and our public services.
All SNP, Green and Alba politicians should be more active and more visible in promoting the cause of independence and no MSP should take the representation of their constituency for granted come the next election in 2026. Those earnestly wishing to see independence delivered within the next five years need to raise their game and personally I would welcome the move to Holyrood of Stephen Flynn, and possibly of Stephen Gethins, Dave Doogan and other MPs and ex-MPs, as more talent in our parliament would undoubtedly help to raise not only the level of proficiency of the Scottish Government but the level of the independence debate across Scotland.
Those SNP MSPs already doing a good job on behalf of their constituents, performing competently in government (or in supporting the government), as well as in actively advancing self-determination for Scotland, should not fear losing the endorsement of their constituents. Perhaps it’s being naïve but I would like to think that all current SNP MSPs would enthusiastically welcome a re-vitalised SNP presence at Holyrood, more effective Scottish governance and faster progress towards Scotland rightfully taking its place as an independent nation."
Read some reaction here 👈
Today, one of our readers argues that the SNP badly needs Mr Flynn – and several other MPs and ex-MPs – in Holyrood to reinvigorate a flagging independence campaign,
Stan Grodynski of Longniddry writes:
"Stephen Flynn’s decision to seek to be elected as the SNP candidate for the Aberdeen South and North Kincardine constituency at the next Scottish Election has caused much debate, not all of it edifying. For a start, should he be successful and also decide to continue to represent Aberdeen South as an MSP, it would be misleading to describe that as 'double-jobbing' as much of his constituency work would overlap, as would parliamentarygovernmental information provision.
While it is understandable that Audrey Nicoll and other current MSPs who are working hard on behalf of their constituents are concerned about apparently inexplicit current SNP internal processes, the fact is that every one of Scotland's SNP MSPs, in spite of disingenuous claims by opposition MSPs, could have done more to advance self-determination and the cause of independence. To my knowledge we have not had many, if any, local conventions on the way forward for Scotland that would stimulate wider debate on Scotland's constitutional future, never mind a national Civic Convention, and I have seen little in local newspapers or on billboards proclaiming the Scottish solution to Broken Brexit Britain which is Scotland’s independence.
Instead Nigel Farage and Reform, backed by those who helped to mis-sell Brexit, are proclaiming at every opportunity that the answer to all of Britain’s problems is to substantially reduce immigration while knowing that such a policy would do significantly more damage to the Scottish economy and our public services.
All SNP, Green and Alba politicians should be more active and more visible in promoting the cause of independence and no MSP should take the representation of their constituency for granted come the next election in 2026. Those earnestly wishing to see independence delivered within the next five years need to raise their game and personally I would welcome the move to Holyrood of Stephen Flynn, and possibly of Stephen Gethins, Dave Doogan and other MPs and ex-MPs, as more talent in our parliament would undoubtedly help to raise not only the level of proficiency of the Scottish Government but the level of the independence debate across Scotland.
Those SNP MSPs already doing a good job on behalf of their constituents, performing competently in government (or in supporting the government), as well as in actively advancing self-determination for Scotland, should not fear losing the endorsement of their constituents. Perhaps it’s being naïve but I would like to think that all current SNP MSPs would enthusiastically welcome a re-vitalised SNP presence at Holyrood, more effective Scottish governance and faster progress towards Scotland rightfully taking its place as an independent nation."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel