We’re moving office this week. And in the boxes hidden in cupboards we’ve been reminded that it was not so long ago that mention of abortion in the news pushed your story far from the headlines, sitting in a corner of an inside page, hoping readers wouldn’t take umbrage. Not so any more.
We’re coming out of a week where safe access zones have finally rolled out across the last part of the UK and Ireland, where women have been speaking openly about their experiences of harassment, and where abortion is the almighty shadow cast over Tuesday’s US election.
For many, silence on reproductive rights is no longer an option.
READ MORE:
'Only one doctor can provide surgical abortion in Scotland'
The US has us asking: where's Scotland’s reproductive health agenda?
Looking at it from the outside, it can be hard to explain quite how abortion became the spark that lit the flame under this US election. For people who don’t spend their lives with their eyes on abortion politics, it probably started with the overturning of Roe v Wade, maybe with Trump’s first election, maybe with the death of iconic pro-choice Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader-Ginsberg.
The reality is harder though – and more deeply entrenched. It’s the result of decades of legal maneuvering by anti-abortion fanatics whose desire to limit women’s choices, it turns out, extends far beyond abortion to contraception, IVF, and our right to vote. It’s the divorcing of decision-makers from the voters who have – given the chance – voted for abortion rights in ever-increasing numbers. It’s the wholesale radicalisation of a political wing who have established a system which allows them to pour money into removing women’s most basic rights.
I’ll be clear - that’s not where we are here. In the UK, nearly 90% of people believe in a woman’s right to choose – even where we wouldn’t have an abortion ourselves, we don’t believe it’s our business to tell others they mustn’t. The US is a cautionary tale, not a template. But the fear it sows pervades.
For women, that fear isn’t just about politics. At its core it’s about disenfranchisement, disempowerment, of the safety that you had counted on for 50 years always being one bad election, one deranged candidate away from removal. It’s a fear that power over our own bodies is given to us, not owed to us. No matter how unlikely, it’s an increasingly difficult fear to shake.
To be an abortion provider in this time you may think is challenging – but the opposite is true. It’s a vocation, a duty, and a moral responsibility to ensure that what has happened to women in the US can never happen here.
That isn’t for want of trying by people who oppose a woman’s right to choose. We are here not because Britain is immune to this opposition, but because in the darkness, advocates like us have spent decades fighting off attempts to dismantle women’s rights. Whether that was by sweeping weeks off the abortion time limit, forcing women into counselling with anti-abortion organisations, requiring them to wait for days after they’ve made their decision, or forcing them to travel for care they could receive at home.
Wave after wave of attempts, fought off by people deeply committed to a woman’s right to choose – committed despite knowing that the wider public, the press, would never know about their battles. That their names and their victories would live in boxes, in cupboards, silently propping up women’s rights.
So while American women’s lives hang in the balance, we are not blind to their fear.
As we march forwards with reproductive rights – with safe access zones, with proposals to decriminalise abortion – we should remember that as the light shines bright on abortion and women who need it, if we in the UK have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.
Rachael Clarke is the Chief of Staff for the British Pregnancy Advisory Service
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here