This week’s Budget has of course attracted lots of comment, with The Herald’s Business Editor, Ian McConnell, saying it “felt like a very big one indeed”.

👉 Read his report here

Today one of our readers suggests a host of ways in which the Chancellor could have raised money other than raising taxes.

William Loneskie of Lauder writes: "With taxation in the UK already at a 70-year high, Chancellor Reeves has increased it further. With the national debt over 100% of GDP she has increased that too. Instead of cutting government spending she will recklessly spend more billions which the UK does not have, on projects which are not needed.

(Image: Newsquest) "There are billions to be saved if she were a prudent Chancellor, which she is not. A red pen and a ruler could be taken to some or all of the following: HS2, whose costs are already over £100 billion; the net zero project which according to National Grid ESO will cost £3 trillion; supporting foreign wars overseas, of which Ukraine has sucked £13bn from the public purse; £7.2 billion a year on foreign aid, £4bn on illegal immigrants, and £300bn annually on social security.

"When you consider in view of all this expenditure that Chancellor Reeves is emphatic that cutting the winter fuel payment for 10 million pensioners was essential to save only £1.4bn you begin to worry about her competence in high office, or her empathy with senior citizens who have worked all their lives and paid the taxes which Ms Reeves is now squandering."

📨 Read more in our Letters page
Letters should not exceed 500 words. We reserve the right to edit submissions.