This article appears as part of the Lessons to Learn newsletter.
Today is an important day for the education team at The Herald.
My colleague Garrett Stell and I, supported by Gregor Kyle and Deborah Anderson from the editorial team, and backed by editor Catherine Salmond, have been at this for about 18 months now, and I think in that time we’ve done a lot of good work.
I was pretty open when I started this job that the goal was to make things better. For years I had complained about the quantity and quality of coverage of Scottish education in the mainstream press, and now we were being given the chance to change the equation.
Sometimes, that has meant pursuing an education news story with the sort of tenacity you might more typically see for political scoops: the Glasgow teacher cuts is one example, while the (still going, and increasingly ridiculous) investigation into Higher History marking is the latest.
We’ve run specials on both the college and university sectors (in both cases we opened up new data to provide a fresh insight into the reality of funding levels), reported on from more of the country than was previously the case, worked to make official education stats more manageable and engaging for our readers, and tried to feature just a little bit of the huge amount of terrific work going on in nurseries, schools, colleges and universities (and wrestling gyms) across the country.
Read more:
Lessons to Learn | Higher History exam marking fiasco is worse than it appears
But there’s always another door to push at, and today we’ve done something that I’m really excited about – we’ve launched a new supplement called Education HQ.
Over twelve pages, we’ve brought together reporting, feature writing and commentary to offer a range of different angles on various aspects of the Scottish education system.
The front page story comes from Caroline Wilson, who is reporting on concerns about a 60 percent drop off in uptake of Gaelic Medium Education between primary and secondary school levels. In it, one expert raises a number of issues, including the prospect of Gaelic becoming a “language of education rather than a language for speaking”.
Inside, Craig Williams has written about the High School of Glasgow achieving Gold in the Scottish Book Trust’s nationwide Reading Schools scheme, and Josh Pizzuto-Pomaco is looking at growing mental health and wellbeing concerns in higher education.
Read more:
Lessons to Learn | Education money going abroad? Well, Jenny Gilruth has more sitting in a drawer
We’ve also got a contribution from Professor Louise Hayward, who led a major review into qualifications and assessment, a piece on AI in education, information about careers support, and an insight into a new type of course available for secondary school pupils.
You can also read some typically excellent work from Garrett Stell: there’s an article on the fascinating partnership between a primary school and a college to build and operate air filters, another about a new ‘ethical literacy’ concept centred around recognising the reliability and trustworthiness of online material, and a comment piece that draws on his experience of the Community College system in the USA to ask questions about the approach here in Scotland.
For my part, I was lucky enough to get to visit a Glasgow primary school to see their ‘edible playground’, as well as a vet school where I learned a great deal about the issues facing the profession and the challenges involved in getting a male horse onto an operating table. I also talked to an academic about his team’s research into paratexts in ancient religious literature, and have contributed a comment piece about the state of Scotland’s education reform process.
It’s all still a little bit experimental, and was pulled together fairly quickly, but I’m very proud of what we’ve managed to produce – and if you missed it, don’t worry, because all the content will be available online in the coming days.
Sign up for a weekly expert insight into Scottish education straight to your inbox.
The reaction so far has been incredibly encouraging, and reaffirms the belief that brought me to The Herald in the first place: that there is a considerable audience for education journalism centred on depth, insight, commitment and compassion.
It might seem strange in a largely digital age (and maybe it is) but there’s something about putting together a distinct publication that will, I think, open up even more space for the type of journalism that has drawn people to us over the past year or so.
So thank you to everyone who has picked up a copy of Education HQ, and please do let us know what you think.
Hopefully, this is just the start.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here