It is three years since Operation Branchform, a Police Scotland investigation into SNP finances, was launched.
Last week we reported that the matter had been raised in the House of Lords, with a UK Government whip saying that “UK crime enforcement agencies would be on hand to assist Police Scotland with the ongoing probe into the SNP’s finances” if requested.
Today one of our readers, a veteran politician and campaigner for Scottish independence, airs his concerns.
Jim Sillars of Edinburgh writes:
Crime Agency and Serious Fraud Office assisting Police Scotland with its Operation Branchform was raised in the House of Lords. Really? The core group of full-time people who operate the SNP machine is small, and in commercial terms comparison is a very small company, not some complex banking or international investment group of the kind that would require the involvement of those two organisations.
"I see the possibility of the National"I know I am not alone in wondering why, with only three people originally taken to a police station for questioning, and the small size of the SNP management core, apparently no conclusion can be reached after three years of police investigation and references to the Crown Office.
"This extraordinary length of time hanging over the heads of people whose names are known is unfair to them, and raises questions about whether the Crown Office, as it was under James Wolffe’s leadership, continues to be unable to disentangle law from politics."
📨 Read more in our Letters page
Letters should not exceed 500 words. We reserve the right to edit submissions.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel