The Assisted Dying debate took another turn this week when showbiz royalty in the form of Dame Esther Rantzen criticised Labour Health Secretary Wes Streeting for stating his opposition to proposed legislation, saying the current situation could force her to “fly to Zurich to die alone”.
Today a reader responds to her “psychological intimidation”.
Denis Bruce of Bishopbriggs writes:
"'Will you force me to fly to Dignitas to die alone?'
"Dame Esther Rantzen's most recent remark, in a letter sent to Wes Streeting for daring to declare his distaste for a law on assisted dying, is nothing short of psychological intimidation. Should her sense of entitlement, which derives from her position as a respected and iconic broadcaster, upon which she has traded for several months now to capture the headlines on this topic, dictate that the law she would like to see on the statute books must come to pass?
stage four lung cancer that she is suffering from and no one would wish to see her ending her days in excruciating pain. But the door is always open to her to opt for palliative care where pain relief will be on offer to minimise any physical torment coming her way.
"Everyone has great sympathy for the terminal condition of"Furthermore, she would not have to die alone in a hospice where her relatives and friends could gather to be with her in her final moments when she is slipping into irreversible unconsciousness.
"While she advocates what she considers the compassionate choice, she should take into account that she will be guilty of opening the door to major extensions of assisted dying despite the supposed stringent safeguards surrounding such a law in its initial stages, if such a law comes into force.
"Dignity in death is important but it should be supervised with compassionate care under proper medical supervision in a hospice with access to the most effective pain relief medications to ease the patients' pain on their way out of life."
📨 Read more in our Letters page
Letters should not exceed 500 words. We reserve the right to edit submissions.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel