Our Letters Pages often discuss the bread and butter issues.
Today, one of our readers does that in a literal sense, bemoaning the omnipresence of sourdough and launching his own Save our Sandwich campaign.
Ian Hutcheson of Glasgow writes:
“It's midday, and I’m reading through the restaurant menu, looking for a light meal to provide succour after a busy morning, and energy prior to tackling my afternoon tasks. A toasted sandwich should fit the bill, and there’s a tempting list to run my eye down, featuring a variety of fillings.
"There is however, a common denominator that concludes the detailed description of each and every sandwich, and indeed appears to have the character of a final flourish: each desirable sandwich is proudly proclaimed to be made with sourdough toast.
"This, I have to say, is not a new experience, as sourdough toast has become the sine qua non of the world of sandwich-making, replacing the slices of traditional British bread which, with their comforting crunchy exterior enfolding a yielding and tasty filling, satisfied the taste buds of generations over the decades.
"These days, however, operators of restaurants, cafes and coffee shops have decreed that a sandwich is only a sandwich if sourdough is used, and that ordinance presents the challenge of breaking through the cliff face of the crust, a task that requires the diner to have the teeth and jaws of an alligator.
"Some of us, however, no longer retain these endowments in peak condition and are being deprived of our sandwich satisfaction. It is time now to take action against the dictatorial and thoughtless action of the purveyors of sandwiches. We must send out an SOS, a Save Our Sandwich demand, that a traditional sandwich must be an option on the menu.
"So, this lunchtime, faced with a Hobson’s choice of a sandwich menu, what should I do? I decided it was time for a waffle.”
📨 Read more in our Letters page
Letters should not exceed 500 words. We reserve the right to edit submissions.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel