The excitement of Scottish university semesters starting in recent weeks is dampened by one pressing issue for new students. Recent articles in The Herald and elsewhere, following a report by the Scottish Parliament Cross-Party Group on Housing, have highlighted the challenge of finding affordable and suitable housing.
Scotland’s student housing crisis, driven by a rapidly growing student population and insufficient housing supply, has reached a critical point, especially in major cities like Edinburgh and Glasgow. Edinburgh alone has seen a 30% rise in its student population over the past five years, yet the pipeline of new beds is just not keeping up. This growing gap between supply and demand is worsened by developers’ focus on high-end Purpose-Built Student Accommodation (PBSA).
Last year’s Savills report showed a rise in UCAS acceptances, with non-EU student growth offsetting the post-Brexit decline in EU students. However, in the past 12 months, fewer international students have enrolled, freeing up spaces for domestic students. While this benefits local students academically, it worsens the housing crisis. International students can typically afford high-end PBSA units, but domestic students often cannot, leaving the accommodation gap unresolved.
The focus on high-end PBSA developments is resulting in a significant shortage of mid- to low-cost student housing entering the market. Meanwhile, the number of private landlords is decreasing due to regulatory changes aimed at rogue landlords, forcing many to sell. Rising interest rates have compounded the problem, with mortgage costs now often exceeding rental income. As private landlords exit, the burden shifts to commercial developers, who are also under financial pressure.
These issues are made worse by the high cost of land, particularly in city centres where student housing is most needed. Additionally, planning delays and rejections - often due to concerns over the density of student populations in certain areas - further complicate the development of affordable student housing. Together, these factors make a difficult environment that hinders the creation of affordable options for students.
Potential solutions to this growing problem include developers building PBSAs in more off-pitch locations, refurbishing existing properties instead of rebuilding, or repurposing outdated private rental buildings. A growing trend involves student housing developers buying older housing stock and upgrading it to improve quality and value.
Indeed, the real opportunity for affordable PBSA lies in retrofitting. With the Scottish office market shifting towards state-of-the-art, ESG-focused grade A spaces, many former office buildings are no longer suitable for commercial use. This creates an opportunity to repurpose these buildings for student housing, if the locations are suitable.
In a recent Herald column, Marissa MacWhirter urged local authorities to “put their foot down” and require developers to include a minimum number of affordable units. While this would be a positive step, it could push developers away from expensive city centres. This could be beneficial, however, in encouraging developers to explore more off-pitch areas, opening up new opportunities for affordable housing.
These solutions remain viable ways to increase affordable student accommodation, but it is becoming clear that meaningful change will require political intervention - either locally or nationally. Until then, the gap in affordable housing will likely continue to grow, particularly in Scotland’s major university cities.
Jonathan Seddon is a partner in MFMac’s Infrastructure & Capital Projects Team
Agenda is a column for outside contributors. Contact: agenda@theherald.co.uk
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here