Fandom can be an intense thing. Unsettling, even.
Not only are there swarms of Beatles fans who think that the involvement of Yoko Ono is solely responsible for the demise of the most famous pop group in history, but fans of Seattle grunge group Nirvana are willing to take it even further.
According to certain fans, authors, and investigators, Kurt Cobain’s famous 1994 suicide by shotgun was not the consequence of a struggling man with the entire world on his shoulders. He was murdered by his wife, Hole frontwoman Courtney Love, in a nefarious plot for financial control of his estate.
This is not some niche conspiracy either, otherwise it would be easy enough to ignore. Plenty of books have been written, the popular Nick Broomfield documentary Kurt & Courtney tries to validate the theory, and each generation of Nirvana fan eventually makes their way to it.
Read more:
I don’t want to hear ‘Yoko Ono broke up The Beatles’ ever again
It should be a simple case of Occam’s razor. Did Cobain, a man clinically depressed since early childhood, who struggled to develop healthy coping skills, and had a tumultuous time in the limelight, commit suicide? Or was it an elaborate hitman plot by his wife, which has been silenced and hidden away from us for three decades?
The evidence put forward of this supposed hitman plot is always conjecture, mere theories taken as fact by the believers.
Part of his suicide note had different styled handwriting. It could not have been that he wrote that part on a different surface or a myriad of other explanations – no, it is assumed that Love must have written it after the fact as part of the cover-up.
Cobain supposedly had too much heroin in his system to be able to pick up the gun and shoot. Yet Cobain was a heavy user of the drug, his tolerance would have changed its effect, and we don’t know how his body would have individually reacted to the level found in his system.
The ‘facts’ go on and on like this endlessly, all hinging on the mildest level of plausibility and wilfully disregarding any straightforward answers. The straightforward answers are simply too inconvenient to fit into the long-running narrative web being extensively spun.
Then there are the strange and untrustworthy figures surrounding the murder theory. One of the most prominent figures brought up is El Duce, frontman of shock punk band The Mentors. According to Mr. Duce, Love paid him $50,000 to ‘whack’ Cobain. He passed a polygraph test (a notoriously unreliable indicator of the truth) and used the notoriety from his claim to go on TV talk shows and feature in various magazines. That his claim has been taken seriously, and not seen as the publicity stunt it was, is the real conspiracy here.
A lot of the information provided and weaponised comes from Tom Grant, a private investigator who was once hired by Love to monitor Cobain. Grant has made quite the career for himself pushing this theory and is seen as a credible source in the eyes of the Courtney Killed Kurt milieu. Just one more new revelation and he’ll crack the case, surely. Or he’ll just blame the Seattle Police Department for withholding the truth. I suppose Love must have paid off an entire police department to keep quiet like some powerful mob boss.
So where does all this come from? Perhaps it’s the high level of idealisation surrounding Cobain, with Love – his abrasive, outspoken wife – playing the perfect scapegoat for a tragic end. Trying to grasp the fragile mental state of a rock idol and how he was brought to suicide is seemingly more difficult to parse than a fantastical narrative of murder plots and cover-ups.
Cobain and Love’s marriage was not an easy union, and no one would suggest otherwise. They married shortly after meeting, they were both heavy heroin users raising a young child in danger of being taken away by child protective services, and the microscope was always focused on them and exacerbated their problems.
But their relationship wasn’t an uncaring or transactional one, at least to the extent that Love would want to murder her husband. A month before his suicide, Cobain had overdosed in a hotel room in Rome. Love had awoken to find him unresponsive and called for help. Would those with murder in their eyes not see the perfect crime laid out in front of them? If Love wanted him dead, why would she not leave him to die from the overdose? She didn’t, she saved him. Just that alone makes an elaborate hitman plot unnecessary and nonsensical.
Read more:
When I surpassed the 27 Club, I couldn’t romanticise rock stars anymore
For certain fans, Love is an unwelcome presence in their adoration of Cobain, and it is surely a factor in why the murder theory has managed to gain legs. Love is still even accused of letting Cobain write her songs, not even allowing the musician the simple grace of her own talents. But the opposite is true: Love had a stubborn pride in not letting her husband contribute to her music. The lyrics for Nirvana’s last studio album In Utero are littered with words from Love’s poetry and letters.
Sadly, the idea of Cobain being murdered by his loose cannon hellraising wife will find itself a new audience, just as it has before, and the cottage industry of books, films, and crime stories will continue to provide all the ammunition the conspiracy needs. But is it a valiant effort to stand up for the late musician and find the truth, or is it just denying the sober reality of a tragic end?
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here