This has not been a good week for supporters of universal benefits, with the winter fuel allowance and the extension of free school meals to older primary pupils confirmed as being for the axe.
Today one of our readers contends that such benefits have been paid for through our taxes, and argues that we are not getting our money’s worth.
AJ Clarence of Prestwick writes: "I know it's old-fashioned, but a lot of people think that they paid taxes, on their income, expenditure, capital gains and inheritances, to level the playing field and make sure that we all had a chance to be part of a secure and sustainable society.
"They thought that decent pensions, cradle to grave health and social care, accessible justice, defence, decent housing, transport and education would be well funded and available to all, given the vast sums paid into the scheme.
"Apparently not. Our taxes have been used to finance daily government expenditure: a Ponzi scheme. The billions we paid in have all been spent.
"We hear people suggest that 'free' prescriptions, health care, college and university education, baby boxes, travel for the old, the young and asylum seekers, housing benefit, what used to be called family allowance (paid to women) and cold weather payments are not affordable. These are not 'free', the recipients have paid for them in advance all their lives.
"All we want is our money's worth. We have paid for all of the above, we set them up, we put them in place, so now, why should we be convinced that all the profits for running our utilities, like rail, buses, power, the internet, education, health and gas, should be going to foreign companies, many of them state-owned, but not by our state?"
Get the Letter of the Day straight to your inbox.
Read more in our Letters page
Letters should not exceed 500 words. We reserve the right to edit submissions.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel