Picture a typical morning in your life.
You might go to a coffee shop, where you’ll see more customers using their own reusable cups, rather than disposable cups. As you enter a clothes shop, you might notice that, while high street chains continue to stock cheap low-quality clothes, many consumers are more aware of the scourge of fast fashion and instead opting for more expensive but higher-quality clothes produced in more ethical environments. As the deadline for Scotland to fulfil net zero targets approaches (2045), the wider Scottish public is becoming increasingly conscious of the need for sustainable choices.
Yet as you walk down the street you may not notice one area where unsustainable practices remain. We tend to take for granted that the buildings we live and work in are the result of careful, quality investment. However, just as an individual might buy an inexpensive item of clothing to save money, some in the construction industry continue to utilise poor-quality materials which end up costing more.
The building and construction sector accounts for an eye-watering 37% of global operational carbon emissions, with fast fashion getting more stick and contributing less with 10% carbon emissions. Using substandard materials is not only financially disadvantageous in the long run, it's unsustainable. The consequences of cutting corners by implementing poor materials reverberate in many ways, from the way they are sourced to the transport methods involved and even the fuels used in transportation. Low-quality materials are also more liable to damage, which means they need replacing more quickly – creating a repetitive cycle which is both financially and environmentally destructive.
We need to open up better discussion, within the construction industry and also adjacent industries, and collaborate.
We also need to invest in green skills, embedding a sustainable ethos at all stages –from early planning t through to building completion, and afterwards. Successful case studies should be shared across the industry to prove to sceptics that those who invest in high-quality materials and the accompanying skillset will reap the rewards. It’s crucial that we keep the bigger picture in mind and don’t allow ourselves to develop tunnel vision in terms of the huge impact our industry choices have. At Harley Haddow we are passionate about raising awareness of sustainable practice throughout our various projects and our Pledge to Net Zero.
Retrofitting (making existing structures more sustainable) will also contribute towards a more environmentally friendly industry. Just as choosing second-hand clothing as a more sustainable alternative to fast fashion, improvement work to make existing buildings more energy-efficient will create a positive effect in both societal and environmental terms.
To harness the potential of a sustainable revolution in construction, a collective effort is required. It’s not only up to engineers : many industries have a role to play in making sure that our buildings don’t emulate the example of fast fashion. As the public begins to wake up to the reality of committing to sustainability in the long run, we need to match this with a commitment to change.
Shweta Salvankar is Senior Building Performance and Sustainability Engineer at Harley Haddow
Agenda is a column for outside contributors. Contact: agenda@theherald.co.uk
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here