Throughout all my 16 years as a secondary teacher, I was very firmly of the view that outdoor education is one of the most valuable and rewarding learning experiences that any young person can have throughout their whole school career. In particular, I felt that residential outdoor education – when young people can experience an environment very far removed from their usual everyday situations – can be life-changing.
Adventurous new experiences in the outdoors imbue young people with lifelong connections to the natural environment; they build self-esteem, self-reliance, confidence and, most importantly, resilience.
They also help young people to learn leadership skills, the importance of valuing friendship and what it means to be part of a team. These are skills which not only enrich our own lives as individuals, but they are also the skills that employers want to see in new recruits to the workforce.
The evidence illustrating the benefits of residential outdoor education, both at home and abroad, is well documented and also compelling – so compelling that I do not believe anyone should miss out. Indeed, listening to young people whose lives have been changed as a result of outdoor education has been one of the most rewarding aspects of my entire parliamentary career and I know I am not alone in that view.
READ MORE:
- MSP in call to consider graduate endowment in wake of cuts
- MSPs have 'head in the sand' over free university tuition
Last summer, I spent time at the Outward Bound school on Ullswater, along with Welsh Senedd Member Sam Rowlands, and Westminster MP Tim Farron, both of whom have similar aspirations for Wales and England. On that occasion, none of us could fail to be impressed by the young people we met, their parents and their teachers.
That is why I want to change things.
Currently, some schools in Scotland provide residential outdoor education on a regular basis for young people (and do it very well) but many do not. Often, the intention is there but there are too many circumstances which conspire against the provision.
So the aim of my Bill is to remove these barriers so that all young people can have the opportunity to experience at least a week of outdoor residential education during their school career.
Liz Smith MSP wants all children to experiencd outdoor education (Image: PA)
I am very conscious that one of these barriers is often cost, so I have made some suggestions to the Scottish Government about how these costs can be met via a public trust model rather than by expecting the Scottish Government and local authorities to pay the whole cost when they are already facing huge financial pressures.
Members’ Bills take time. It is almost three years since I first started researching the whole issue before I then went through the parliamentary process of a formal consultation, analysing the responses – of which there were 436 (almost unanimously positive) – engaging with various stakeholders such as local authorities, teaching unions, the outdoor education sector and parents’ groups.
Having completed that process, I then worked with the Parliament’s first-class Bill legislation team who wrote the proposed Bill which I formally lodged in Parliament on June 20, just before recess. It will move to the Stage 1 process at the Education Committee in the autumn and I have been very encouraged by the support from colleagues and by the interest taken in the consultation stages by Scottish Government ministers.
In an age following Covid, when there is growing national concern about young people’s physical and mental health, the benefits of residential outdoor education cannot be overstated.
Furthermore, there are too many young people from some of the most deprived areas who do not get the same opportunities as their counterparts elsewhere.
As an MSP, I am determined to address this inequality, and, with this Bill, I can ensure that all young people are able to enjoy an enriched school experience, the benefits of which will stand them in good stead for the rest of their lives.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel