I WAS delighted to see the very detailed exposé of councillors' working conditions and salaries by Marissa MacWhirter ("Councillors are on front line of democracy and deserve a pay hike", The Herald, August 16). I was a Liberal Democrat councillor for 34 years and, as I retired at the last elections in 2022, I cannot be accused of trying to feather my own nest.
The writer is correct; it's not just about the money, although that is important. When I was the depute leader of the council (2007-12) (as well as convenor of social work and arts) I worked around 70 hours per week on council business. Financially I could not have done that without the support of my husband's income. But the pressure on councillors to do what was right, all the time, with huge amounts of political negativity added to the mix, was draining.
Don't get me wrong, I loved being a councillor. I felt that it was the most fulfilling work that I could do, being at the front line of politics, helping people face to face in a way that few other politicians do. But the lack of recognition, particularly seen in the lack of remuneration, was shocking. I saw this most closely when the multi-member wards were being set up, and questions were being raised in Holyrood about this (I know, I was there). It was mooted that council leaders should, in general, be paid on a scale similar to MSPs. I went further at the time, suggesting that leaders should be equivalent to a minister, as the role of a council leader is more akin to that job. As you can tell, that proposal was not accepted. The idea that a backbench MSP's responsibilities are equivalent to twice that of a council leader is laughable, if it were not so sad.
We need to respect our councillors (well, mostly), we need to pay them properly, and then we need to ensure that they are fulfilling their duties. I cannot understand how a councillor can do a full-time job and be even an ordinary councillor, but many need to, in order to make ends meet at home. Most councillors give of themselves, working hard, giving up all leisure time and often family time, to help to support their constituents. Please, start thinking about what they do, in comparison with an MSP or minister, and start paying them properly and giving them the respect they deserve.
(Former councillor) Eileen McCartin, Paisley.
• MARISSA MacWhirter's article tells us nearly all we need to know, in two figures, about the poor state of our local government. On the front line, as Marissa says, are our councillors, whose job is on the line every four years, who get all the flak that we, the public, can throw at them, for an annual salary of £21,345 (the first figure). These are the people who are called to account and are expected to be able to answer all our concerns, yet we think that it is only a part-time job?
However, behind our councillors is an army of people, faceless people who are paid up to, or over the second figure of £200,000 per annum. Yet who are these people and who holds them to account? Do they answer to us when there are questions to be answered about potholes, about bins being emptied, about the state of our schools and so on? No, it's the politicians who are expected to answer. Never having been paid a salary of anything approaching that second figure, yet having in my career worked long hours at all times of the day and night, many of them outside, not in a cosy office, I can't understand why salaries of that level are offered.
Surely, we have it the wrong way round? The people carrying the responsibility for big budgets and big decisions should be rewarded at a higher level than those who, while doing necessary and often complex work, hide behind them?
Patricia Fort, Glasgow.
READ MORE: So where's the change? Labour is acting just like the Tories
READ MORE: Is spending on indy more important than our children's education?
READ MORE: GERS shows us how badly the UK is run by Westminster
Why indy must be prioritised
CHARLES Bannerman's letter (August 17) poses the question: is spending on independence-related matters more important than education? Leaving aside that such questions, in one form or another, are a regular feature of unionist supporters' letters, the core question implied is "how do governments prioritise their objectives?".
That is a complex subject that can't be addressed fully in a letter, but let me offer the essentials in this case.
A government has many priorities dependent on its core beliefs and values, from day-to-day matters of policy to major overarching fundamental political beliefs, as expressed in the manifesto that put it in office. In a settled state (when there is such an entity) the nature of its constitutional government is not one of them.
The state of the Union of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is manifestly not such a settled constitutional state and has not been for a very long time. The Union is a failed conglomerate, the sad and confused remainder of a lost Empire, with citizens in every one of its four component parts in various degrees of challenge to its existence. The devolutionary structure has failed it, with catastrophic results epitomised by the14 wasted and lethal years of Tory Government, ones which won't be remedied by the feeble pale Tory replacement for it: the Starmer Government.
The Scottish devolved government was elected on a mandate to free the Scottish nation from that suffocating, disintegrating Union.
The independence question is therefore the overarching objective and priority of the Scottish Government, since no other priority of government, for example education, can ever be delivered fully while Scotland remains in that Union. But it does not preclude it governing as effectively as it can within the temporary limitations of the Union.
What's left of the Union is beyond any reform, beyond any remedy.
Peter Curran, Kirkliston.
Get the Letter of the Day straight to your inbox.
John Mason unfit for office
JOHN Mason was quite correct in his assertion that Israel could have killed 10 times as many Gazans as they already have.
A few more 500-pound American bombs dropped on a trapped and defenceless population of mainly women and children and 40,000 deaths could easily have reached 400,000 or more. It may still do: the Gazan civilian population is helpless.
Unfortunately and incomprehensibly, Mr Mason also suggested that the slaughter of 40,000 humans (along with the 100,000 injured and the countless thousands entombed in the rubble) didn’t reach the definition of genocide (by a factor of 10 presumably) ("MSP John Mason says he stands by Israel tweet despite backlash", heraldscotland, August 19). Mr Mason is much more than an "embarrassment" as described by Ian Blackford. He is a disgrace and has proved himself to be morally bankrupt and utterly unfit for public office.
Douglas Simpson, Fortrose.
• JOHN Mason is an avowed Christian with strong views on the sanctity of life, from assisted dying to abortion. He has stood outside clinics in protest while unfortunate women seeking abortions have passed by, in order to preserve the existence of a foetus, an act that many people feel is harassment. He has made his views known on assisted dying, wishing to prolong the lives of people suffering through the final stages of terminal illness, something in which I have a personal interest.
His latest intervention in support of Israel's denial that the killing of people, two-thirds of whom are women and children, is not genocide, and that Israel is well equipped to perform such an act if it saw fit, was at the very least crass. However, I think there is another way of describing it: rank hypocrisy.
John Jamieson, Ayr.
John Mason (Image: Newsquest)
Stifling enterprise
OTTO Inglis’ letter (August 16) caused me to think where had I heard this kind of comment about stifling creative enterprise before. I then realised it was in two books I had read, one relating to the famine in North Korea when some enterprising residents of that country grew enough vegetables to feed themselves and also to sell surplus to their neighbours, but this was violently opposed by the controlling regime.
When later reading an account of a young girl who grew up before and during the Russian revolution a similar occurrence happened during the chaotic conditions after that revolution which was a catalyst for famine. Any enterprising business to emerge independent of the state was indeed, anathema, and immediately suppressed. Down with that sort of thing!
Irene Munro, Conon Bridge.
Few parents have a choice
SANDY Gemmill (Letters, August 19), in his response to Otto Inglis' letter of August 16, makes some very interesting points in regard to why parents may or may not choose private education for their children.
Let us not forget that due to financial circumstances, the vast majority of parents have no such choice.
David Clark, Tarbolton.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel