If you are Christmas shopping this weekend (what do you mean you haven’t started?), be sure to get your paws on Fefe, a new perfume for dogs by Dolce & Gabbana.
Named after Domenico Dolce’s beloved poodle, the perfume costs £85 and is certified suitable for animal use.
Though vets disagree about using scent on dogs - it may interfere with the animal’s sense of smell and cover up bad odours that could be a symptom of diseases - let us push that aside and turn to the serious business of how D&G are going to advertise the stuff.
I’m thinking a black and white commercial with Fefe power-striding towards the camera, looking enigmatic. Or as enigmatic as a ginger poodle can look.
As anyone who accompanies their pet on the morning safari/sniffari knows, dogs are into stinks, big-time.
“Dogs recognise themselves by smells, they recognize a person by a smell,” said Federico Coccia, a vet in Rome.
“When the dog arrives, he sees you, wags his tail, but first smells you and then recognises you because you are stored in one of his ‘smell drawers’. Therefore, this world of smells should not be changed.”
Fefe the perfume is described as a “gentle and delicate” blend of ylang ylang, musk and sandalwood. If the roles were reversed I wonder what a perfume designed by dogs for humans would smell like. Chicken probably, with a top note of sheep droppings. No worse than some aftershaves I’ve encountered.
Afraid I won’t be buying perfume for my girl. She is just not that kind of dog. Some dogs don’t mind faff, others do, and you know which group your pal belongs in.
Hobo is an au naturelle kind of gal. She hasn’t had a bath in the six years she has been here, hates being brushed, and won’t wear a coat if it is raining. The lady’s a tramp, what’s wrong with that?
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel