By David Coombs
FORMER president Donald Trump is still the odds-on favourite to win the US election in November, despite the Democrats’ decision to bring on a last-minute substitute. At the time of writing, it appeared that vice-president Kamala Harris had secured enough support to win the nomination to run against Trump. It will be tough to get back into the race, with only about 100 days before the US goes to the polls.
At the 2019 work Christmas party, my Secret Santa gave me a Trump desktop calendar with a daily “Trumpism” that you can tear off each morning. Sort of like a bunch of fortune cookies written by a pair of angry twins who often disagree violently with each other. But without the cookies.
If profits prove sustainable, UK stocks can rally for a while longer
I still have the calendar on my desk at home: the day in front of me is Monday, March 23, 2020. It was the last day I was in the office before the first Covid lockdown when Boris told us to go home. When I finally returned to the office, I saw the calendar on my desk. It felt slightly dystopian – it also somehow seemed fitting to leave it on that day forever as a reminder of how unpredictable the world is.
The quote for that day was taken from a Trump speech at a Republican primary debate on February 25, 2016. When referring to negotiating peace in the Middle East, he said: “It doesn’t do any good to start demeaning the neighbours, because I would love to do something with regard to negotiating peace, finally, for Israel – and for their neighbours. I cannot do that [be a negotiator] as well if I’m taking big, big sides. With that being said, I am totally pro-Israel.”
There were many such pronouncements. During his first term, I used to dread his Sunday night tweets. Some random ill-thought-through rhetoric that would cause chaos in the markets for the start of the week.
While I believe in free speech, I think his (fleeting) ban from Twitter was good for my stress levels.
When Joe Biden won the last election (and I make no political point here), I was hoping for fewer chaotic headlines and a more considered approach to policy announcements. Crikey, we got that, but also a touch of the absurd in a president’s aids keeping him from view like a parody of Weekend At Bernie’s. Speaking purely selfishly, that was OK with me.
What do the new government’s plans mean for your pension?
So, four years of relative quiet, but now he’s back, it’s back – the Trump risk. This means waking up to big swings in asset prices because of something he wrote or said, which may or may not be followed through.
Recently, there’s refusing to support Taiwan and telling the US Federal Reserve not to cut interest rates before the election. Here we go again.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (which we own) was down 8% in one day, and there was a massive move out of the tech-heavy Nasdaq index and into the more diversified Dow Jones. Like him or not, Trump moves markets and creates volatility – even when he’s not yet in the White House.
Our job is to deal with the financial impacts of a change in policies, not the philosophical or political impacts. We’ve anticipated (although not necessarily predicted) a Trump win for some time, so we’ve made subtle changes to our portfolios, such as buying a European defence company, Thales, to account for that eventuality. It seems likely that regardless of who takes the White House, defence spending is heading upwards all around the world.
India: an investment opportunity too big to ignore
If Trump does return to the White House, the key will be to react to what Trump does, not what he says. And what he says can often be word salad that is too dangerous to attempt deciphering (take the Trumpism above as an example). The volatility he creates via his news conferences and social media proclivities often creates short-term mispricing of risk which we can take advantage of. It’s a circus, of course, which I have a sneaking suspicion he enjoys.
However, most of the policies in his first term had a logic to them that we could follow. The Covid bleach incident was a notable exception.
David Coombs is head of multi-asset investments at Rathbones
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel