With two billion users globally, the use of WhatsApp at work is probably here to stay but, as former Prime Minister Boris Johnson and other leaders have discovered, its use is not without its perils.
The Covid public inquiry brought a host of concerns into sharp relief in terms of the appropriateness and safety of using WhatsApp in a professional setting. The blurring of lines between personal and work life means employers and employees should proceed with caution.
The legal and HR implications can be considerable; one business which failed to include an absent employee in a work-related WhatsApp group chat was deemed to have discriminated against the worker, resulting in an award of £134,000 to the member of staff.
People perceive WhatsApp to be more private than email, but these messages can easily be used as evidence in tribunals and courts.
Employers must navigate whether they can use WhatsApp messages for disciplinary action without violating privacy rights under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Example: the Police Service of Scotland relied on WhatsApp messages as evidence in misconduct proceedings against a police officer; the court ruled the police did not breach privacy or human rights, given the public accountability of the officers.
What is clear is that the law requires a legitimate aim, proportionate to a pressing social need; employers should be aware that WhatsApp messages are subject to evaluation based on the specific circumstances of each case.
Another issue with WhatsApp is its potential to disrupt employees’ ability to switch off outside of work. Employees without a work phone can feel obligated to provide personal numbers to colleagues and professional contacts, making them constantly reachable. This perpetuates an unwelcome "always on" work culture, which can impact mental health, potentially leading to claims for stress and breach of the Working Time Regulations. Indeed, the new UK Government plans to introduce a "right to switch off" from work outside working hours.
A report by Ring Central found that 23% of British workers feel anxious receiving notifications outside of work, rising to 27% among younger workers. This reinforces the considerable HR concerns over this growing practice, and there is little doubt the rise of WhatsApp is a contributing factor.
With this in mind, employers should establish clear policies and train staff in appropriate use, and be clear on the consequences of breaches. This would mitigate risks and, in some cases, could free employers from liability in terms of WhatsApp use. Many workplace policies go further, discouraging contact outside office hours unless previously agreed to respect a healthy work-life balance. Others urge the use of work phones only for professional communication.
More widely, having such policies in place are likely to make staff more aware that work-related messages on personal devices might be recoverable during investigations, prompting more caution in communications overall.
While it is easier to delete an ill-judged WhatsApp message off the recipient’s device than it is to recall an email, anything that encourages work colleagues to ‘think before sending’ serves us all well.
Robin Turnbull is a director at Anderson Strathern and a specialist in employment law
Agenda is a column for outside contributors. Contact: agenda@theherald.co.uk
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here