ROSEMARY Goring ("Make America golf again, but who are the real winners?", The Herald, July 20) manages to unfairly link Donald Trump with every historic negative of golf including misogyny and big business decisions taken in smoke-filled clubhouses. She also tries to maintain the idea that golf is for the elite and not suitable for ordinary males or females.
What a load of nonsense. Royal Troon has an open membership now as does almost every club in Scotland.
Within a few miles of Royal Troon we have six excellent municipal courses, the equivalent of affordable golf. It’s still the case that if someone wishes to pay extra for a higher quality of course then they can do so.
I grew up playing on a municipal course called Littlehill GC in Balornock where a Walter Lyle was the professional. His nephew went on to become quite famous if I recall correctly. There was nothing elite about Littlehill.
On a personal note last Tuesday I had the pleasure of having lunch in Royal Troon as a guest of a member, who like me grew up in Springburn. The clubhouse was full of members and guests or their families including females and even weans were scampering about.
Ms Goring’s references to golf are so out of touch as to be a wee bit silly.
John Gilligan, Ayr.
Degradation of the Open
SADLY, I think I have had my last visit to the Open Championship and fully agree with the observations of reader DH Telford (Letters, July 19).
The R&A has allowed golf to fall into the insatiable maw of the bloated corporate leviathan, thus betraying the very reason for its existence, which is to promote and protect the traditions and values of golf. It has sold its soul to the devil in the pursuit of Mammon.
It has overseen the transformation of the Open from a great sporting occasion where the spectators have a chance to see the best exponents of the game in the flesh to just another corporate event designed solely to generate money for sponsors.
I am fortunate enough to be a member of Royal Troon and attending on Thursday along with my two sons we agreed that unlike previous Opens this became an ordeal not to be repeated. Vast overcrowding made viewing (always difficult on links courses) well-nigh impossible. Cost of entry to the course for members of the public and food and drink prices once inside were exorbitant.
Whilst it used to be a bonus to be a member of the host club my impression this year was that members and staff were treated as second-class citizens confined to their clubhouse and warned against interfering with R&A operations. Inevitably the clubhouse (never designed to accommodate its whole membership at any one given time) became full every afternoon with members and their guests advised to use the public Links Pavilion or other on-course facilities. So despite the fact that the members had provided the venue there was little reciprocity in the arrangement. One possible solution might have been to allow a temporary marquee extension to the clubhouse but presumably this would have meant the loss of a site for another burger van or erosion of spectator stands.
I appreciate that the foregoing could be dismissed as a classic “first world problem" and indeed there were no protest marches, assassination attempts or climate activists glued to the greens, but the degradation of the Open shows where we are going as a society in which everything has a monetary or brand value to be exploited at the expense of traditional values which have hitherto underpinned and enhanced our quality of life.
Keith Swinley, Ayr.
READ MORE: Fiona Hyslop should bang heads together and get ScotRail back on track
READ MORE: Scotland should be proud of its education success
READ MORE: It's madness to throw good money after bad at Ferguson Marine
Wrong turns on public transport
GEOFF Ellis makes some very good points ("No transport from TRNSMT: Scotland needs to do much better than this", The Herald, July 20), so let's consider all the things that have been talked about for public transport, particularly in the Glasgow area.
I remember that back in 2007, there was much talk of a second Subway loop being built out to the east, to venues such as the Emirates stadium, in time for the 2014 Commonwealth Games. Sadly, that's all it was, just talk.
We've had the bus link to the new Southern General, ie the QEUH, built but it's a shadow of what we were led to expect. The publicity gave us modern, almost tram-like buses, but the reality gives us old diesel buses that don't even get priority at traffic lights.
There's the relatively new Riverside Museum, replacing the old Transport Museums, first at the old tram depot, next to Pollokshaws East railway station and then at Kelvinhall, on a bus route. I don't even think there are signs at this new museum directing people to Partick for the city's only train, subway and bus interchange, but the car park gets very full, with visitors choosing to drive there. What happened to the Metrolink tram scheme?
The Crossrail scheme, to link trains from the southside of Glasgow to the low-level lines north of the river, raises its head every so often, only to get pushed back into its box. Likewise, what's happened to the rail link from Glasgow Central to Glasgow Airport?
Recently there has been a big push to get our bus services back into public management, but it's all gone very quiet.
Finally, from me, but I'm sure there's more, ScotRail's challenges with drivers and rest-day working, harks back to the days of British Rail, when most staff were rostered Monday to Friday, with weekends and night working being overtime. Much of this has been addressed but for some reason, some has escaped change.
Yes, there is plenty of action needed as far as public transport is concerned, but one thing Mr Ellis could do, for those of us who live near Glasgow Green and TRNSMT, is to ensure that not only the National Cycle Route along by the Clyde is kept open for as long as possible before the alternative route must be used but that safe routes for active travellers (ie people who walk and cycle) on the north side of the Green are provided.
Patricia Fort, Glasgow.
Like ... not like
JOHN Ireland-Matthew (Letters, July 20) is not alone in being driven mad by the constant use of " you know". Using these words is known as filleritis, other examples being "ah", " um", and the particularly annoying "like".
It's not, you know, like, that I really believe that you know. I just like need time like to know what to say next.
David Miller, Milngavie.
Lawn order
AS an act of selfless benevolence, I wish to donate the substantial quantities of moss that grow annually in my lawn ("Inside the magnificent world of Scotland’s crucial moss species". The Herald, July 22) , to Benmore Botanic Garden. It’s the gift that keeps on growing, so come and get it you guys.
GR Weir, Ochiltree.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel