By Ann Maxwell
In an era where inclusivity is increasingly prioritised, why are individuals with learning disabilities still marginalised when it comes to air travel?
Despite numerous advancements, our most vulnerable continue to face significant challenges, underscoring a critical gap in the transportation sector.
As a mother of a son, Muir, aged 27, with Dravet Syndrome, a severe form of epilepsy, as a family we have experienced several traumatic episodes with airlines and at airports around the world.
The sunflower lanyard, introduced at Gatwick Airport in 2016, was a groundbreaking initiative aimed at supporting individuals with learning disabilities such as autism and dementia. Its adoption worldwide heralded a new era of awareness and assistance. However, the commercialisation and widespread use of the lanyard have diluted its original purpose, leaving many individuals without the necessary protections.
The reality remains stark: individuals with learning disabilities are often treated the same as those with physical disabilities, disregarding their unique cognitive needs. They are herded through airports, often placed in ambulatory vans and assistance vehicles for lift access and seated without consideration for their specific requirements. For instance, during a recent flight, my son Muir, who has learning disabilities, due to the late arrival and subsequent departure of his flight was not given priority seating, leading to unnecessary stress and trauma for himself, his carers and us as a family.
It's crucial to understand that the needs of those with learning disabilities differ significantly from those with physical disabilities. While they might require wheelchairs for mobility, their cognitive needs demand a more nuanced approach. They are typically accompanied by caregivers who are best suited to manage their needs, yet these caregivers often face systemic barriers in providing optimal support. Simple measures like allowing extra time, providing more space, and offering thoughtful consideration can make a profound difference.
An alarming trend has emerged where airlines, prioritising logistical convenience, request that disabled passengers be seated at the rear of the plane for easier lift access. This approach, while possibly beneficial for those with physical disabilities, can be detrimental for those with learning disabilities. These passengers often need to be seated at the front to minimise trauma and sensory overload, ensuring a safer and more comfortable journey.
The overarching priority should always be the safety and well-being of all passengers, including those with learning disabilities. Compromising their needs for the sake of expediency is unacceptable. Airports and airlines must adopt comprehensive policies that delay general boarding until these passengers are settled.
This practice mirrors the accommodations seen in supermarkets, cinemas, and play parks, which have created safe spaces to mitigate sensory overload.
It is imperative that airports and airlines take immediate action to address these issues, not only to comply with the Equalities Act but also to champion true inclusivity and compassion. Ensuring safe and equitable travel for individuals with learning disabilities is not just a legal obligation – it is a moral imperative.
Ann Maxwell, co-founder of the Muir Maxwell Trust
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here