Do you ever hear a song and think it’s from a previous decade, only to find out it’s from one of the hot new properties of the music industry? Do you ever go to the cinema and notice what you’re watching is pretty much an amalgamation of different films you’ve seen before in some distant past?
It’s not your imagination, culture is stuck on repeat. Everything remains the same, recycling the last half century of ideas repeatedly. We are stuck in the limbo of the post-modern cultural cycle, and we just can’t seem to imagine a future with new ideas.
Nostalgia is now major business. If an artist finds themselves out of step with the current moment, then it’s only a matter of time before they become a reference for the new, and those who supported them in their moment will seek to revisit with rose-tinted glasses. Many musicians find themselves starving artists on their initial outing, only to see an opportunity for financially stable touring decades later. Even in the most underground of acts, there is a viable financial reward in revisiting and reliving the past. The nostalgia circuit is set up to continue infinitely.
Read more:
Derek McArthur: No, we shouldn’t just ‘let people enjoy things’
The timeframe for nostalgia gets increasingly smaller too. Culture from a decade ago is already being reappropriated into new mass media products. Was your life better ten years ago? Well, here’s a slice of that peace and comfort that you crave so incessantly. Our relationship with culture often hinges on where we are in our personal lives and how we feel about the world around us, and the movers of the culture industry are happy to prey on this.
In television, we constantly see a stitching together of the familiar. Take Netflix’s super hit Stranger Things as an example, which cribs its themes and visualisation from various 1980s horror and fantasy sources. Stranger Things is a metatextual affair, unable to exist without these sources. When the show features a song from the era, such as Kate Bush’s 1985 hit Running Up That Hill, its popularity explodes and outperforms the wealth of new songs worming its way through the charts.
Some would put this down to the sheer popularity of the show itself, but it’s a bit deeper than that. For those not familiar with the culture of the 1980s, it’s a refreshing look into a point in time where more unique artistic points of view could still break through and progress the scope of ideas in the cultural mainstream. It’s a rare chance to experience an original, not an imitation. Those already familiar are reacquainted with an idealised vision of the past, where the new feels too derivative and numbing to have any effect. In either instance, a visit from the past inspires much more joy, interest, thought, and fanfare than the static looping of recent culture.
Sign up for the Herald Arts newsletter and get a weekly update on arts and culture from Scotland and beyond.
In film, there is an argument that this post-modern cultural cycle took hold in the 1980s and cemented itself with the advent of Indiewood in the 1990s. Indiewood directors were the first bonafide film school generation (film only became a serious subject of academia in the 1970s with the expansion of arts and humanities programmes), where the rules and mechanics of film were already set out and available to learn.
The medium’s history, personal taste, and its influence over the filmmaker became a core part of how their work was conceived and constructed. Quentin Tarantino is an obvious example, scraping direct elements from 1970s exploitation, spaghetti westerns, martial arts flicks etc. and tying them together in an overarching post-ironic veneer. The influence of such filmmakers has replicated itself, to where it’s common for films to be an impression of an impression.
Is this all just a symptom of the era? Culture and the wider world are intrinsically linked and feed into each other. The age of neoliberalism has enclosed in and contained the political and societal progress of the 20th century, and now we are making headway through the 21st century with little envisioning of what a future could look like. The lack of imagination and movement in other aspects has infected culture, and now we seem stuck in a purgatory of regurgitating the same old tired ideas.
There was never some cultural golden age, and certainly, cultural eras of the past had their own issues, but things still progressed, even slowly. We remain circling back around to the familiar ideas of previous years, with little indication that the bubble will burst and a rush of liberated creativity will take its place.
Read more:
Perhaps it's time to rethink our ideas about 'highbrow' art
Before, new rushes of ideas would incubate in the underground, in the dark shadows where they’re free to grow from the pressures of the commercial, where only after would they begin to bleed into mainstream culture. But the gap between the mainstream and subterranean only gets larger, lessening the chance of new forms and expressions from breaking through and embedding themselves into the wider world.
It’s hard to be optimistic. But Vladimir Lenin was correct in saying, “There are decades where nothing happens; and there are weeks where decades happen”. Perhaps the chaos of unpredictability will save us from Groundhog Day.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here