For several years I didn’t wear a watch. I was one of those folk who simply glanced at their mobile phone or the nearest wall clock whenever they needed to know the time.
Then I took up running and got a smartwatch to record distance and pace. I only intended to wear it on runs. At some point, though, I clicked that it also tallied my daily step count, whether I was running or not. And down the rabbit hole I tumbled.
Fast forward 18 months and I now find myself in a slavish relationship with my smartwatch. And it is bordering on obsessive.
It has become a permanent fixture on my wrist. Partly because I have such a pronounced runner’s tan that, even when I’m not wearing a watch, it looks like I am. But mostly because having a gap in its all-seeing analysis gives me serious existential dread.
Several times a day, I will scroll through the myriad settings to check my resting heart rate or peruse the body battery score, which tracks ongoing energy levels.
There is performance data including VO2 max (an indicator of aerobic fitness) and predicted race times (how fast you should be able to run over a set distance). I pore over any fluctuations like a SpaceX Starship engineer calculating a crucial payload.
READ MORE
Who wore it best - Kim Kardashian or Isa from Still Game?
Summer has been my nemesis - I am determined to love it this time
Yep, I’m fully aware that this bears all the hallmarks of someone who has lost the plot. Nor am I alone in this plight. There are a raft of internet memes about the love-hate relationship many people have with their smartwatches.
The general consensus is that it feels akin to toting a judgemental calculator, authoritarian former Eastern Bloc sports coach, helicopter parent and Ron Swanson from Parks and Recreation around everywhere you go.
The sci-fi trope “the machines are coming” used to bring to mind merciless robot soldiers hellbent on destroying human civilisation and colonising Earth. The takeover has been far stealthier than that. They don’t walk among us, but they do live rent-free in our heads.
It is those spirit-crushing moments when you think you have smashed a workout, only for your watch to go, “meh”. I have nicknamed mine Shania Twain because it seems, no matter what I do, it’s like “that don’t impress me much”. Yet, I endlessly crave its approval.
It will beep to tell me to move if it thinks I’ve been sedentary too long. Never mind that I’d already ran eight miles and now having a relaxing soak in the bath or enjoying a Netflix binge with a bowl of cheesy Wotsits in my lap.
READ MORE
I've signed up for Edinburgh half marathon - that's a scary thought
I held onto things 'just in case' - here's the trick to letting go
And don’t expect any sympathy if you aren’t feeling in tip-top form. One such indignity, while laid low with a cold for almost a fortnight, was seeing my training status tumble from “productive” to “recovery” and, finally, “detraining”. To be fair, the last one was a powerful motivator that had me rising like Lazarus from my sickbed.
There are days it seems as if I communicate with machines more than humans. As I write this, the washing machine is beeping to say a cycle is finished, my watch is beeping to tell me to get off my backside and my mobile phone is beeping with a slew of incoming text messages.
An endless cacophony of electronic chimes. All these gadgets are meant to make our lives easier, but sometimes it feels like a flashback to the late 1990s and early 2000s when Tamagotchis - tiny digital “pets” constantly greedy for attention - were all the rage.
The line between helpful and hindrance appears increasingly blurred. The machines are here. And if we’re lucky, at this rate, they might keep us as Tamagotchi-style pets.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here