As I looked over at the two figures standing ten feet away I thought, I’d recognise that jawline anywhere.
Brad Pitt and friend were listening to me talk whilst gazing at the interior roof of the Mack, Charles Rennie Mackintosh’s masterwork building at the Glasgow School of Art.
In 1993 I was giving a tour of the building to about 16 tourists.
It’s some 31 years since I joined the roster of guides while in my third year of a History of Art degree at nearby University of Glasgow.
Along with others also keen to start sketching out what ‘professional development’ might be on a cv, I made it over to the Art School a couple of times a week to host a tour for a princely £5 wage.
Enough to buy lunch after or a ticket for an afternoon film at the GFT down the hill, it didn’t rub so much at the time that each person on the tour paid about the same per ticket and there could be more than 20 on the tour.
I don’t regret it for a second. In hindsight, especially, but even at the time I knew we had access to something special, an artistic work of genius hidden in the plain sight of being a working art school building.
A perfect example of the tension between conservation and education, use it and potentially pay the price - or lose it.
I made this point often - Mackintosh designed the building for use.
It belonged to every art student to whom these tours were probably an annoyance, if they noticed them at all (although it could be said that artistic practice in the late 19th century didn’t present quite the hazard it did 100 years later, but that’s a whole other issue).
Here, Mackintosh was an artist designing for artists. If he needed to ensure that vision was secure, for example laying bricks and mortar with his own hands, he did that.
It was in every corridor seating-nook for conversation; in painting studios deluged in light from multi-storey high windows; or in sweeping drawbridge-like stone steps, perfect for graduation photos or morning cigarette chats.
Everyone else here was a tourist, whether we had paid for a ticket or not.
We started the tours in the small reception area, just outside the gift shop stuffed with its ‘mockintosh’ giftware.
From that small plain whitewashed vestibule there was no way to imagine what came next.
Throughout the building, Mackintosh literally moved you from dark to light, a journey through time - the art school was built over ten years in two halves - in stone and brick and paint and wood.
A dark staircase, reminiscent of Glasgow’s tenement stairwells, took you up into the museum.
Huge black wood beams arched high like the hull of an upturned ship, the black wood noting his interest in Japanese art whilst small floral motifs illustrating a lifelong obsession with natural forms. Plaster casts of classical sculptures had made this a light drenched drawing studio.
Off to the east side, a corridor and staircase where light levels dropped as you climbed, a play on Scottish Baronial architecture, literally turning this ‘castle’ on its head.
Mackintosh didn't just revisit architectural tradition, he moved things forward with wit and confidence.
A good contrast is the University of Glasgow’s Gothic Revival main building, completed only six years before Mackintosh started his building but looking like it's from the 15th century.
At the top of the building, we would emerge from another dark passage into the crystal clear glazed panes of what was called the 'hen run.'
Linking the east and west parts of the building, it was apparently so-called because female students or ‘hens’ would use it to join their male friends in the west half of the building.
READ MORE:
Expert warned Mack building was 'potential furnace' 20 years before first fire
Warning 'daft' new fire service rules threaten more of Glasgow's treasures
'I don't regret being the whistleblower - I'd do it all again'
Read every article in the Glasgow School of Art series
The view it afforded south was wide and expansive and made the most of the building’s placement high over the city, like a challenge to the status quo.
After the hen run another dark stairwell lead to a room which housed key pieces of furniture including the iconic tea room chair and table sets and fine art prints showing Mackintosh’s move into primary colours and abstraction.
I remember one conversation with a visitor here who pointed to one of the iconic ladder chairs and said he’d been able to buy one in 1972 for very little.
We ended the tour in The Library, presented as the pinnacle of Mackintosh’s achievement in the building.
Smallish, not in the least grandiose, a first-level balcony housing special collections, supported by dark wooden posts. A ground floor ‘clearing’ in the centre.
Windows of glazed continuous columns of light running from the ground to the full height of the balcony level.
Jewel-coloured carvings dropping down from the balcony around the room, each was different but could be read continuously perhaps referencing musical notation.
So many details but nothing extraneous. A total work of art, all balance and proportion, warmth and intimacy, subtle yet confidently Mackintosh at his best. A public space with domestic ease. I hope you saw it for yourself.
Brad Pitt didn’t actually come on the whole tour, no doubt bound by a tight Hollywood schedule. He was filming the movie Interview with a Vampire in the UK at the time.
But maybe what he heard and saw in the museum that day was brought to mind when he donated funds to support the first rebuild project, a horrible future scenario we didn’t yet have to imagine.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here