On the face of it there seems little commonality between the period of clearance in the late 18th and first half of the 19th century and population decline in more recent years.
After all a widespread popular view has it that the number of people in the Highlands and Islands fell in earlier times because the population was cleared from the land to make way for large sheep farms.
Eviction on that scale has not been possible since the Crofters Holding Act of 1886 which gave small tenants security of tenure. Therefore any comparisons between the era of clearance and today seem pointless and misconceived.
But the popular view does not convince and is not supported by hard evidence.
Of course, clearance was widespread and caused population movement within and from Scotland.
READ MORE:
- Kate Forbes: 'My dream of independence can halt Highland population decline'
- 'This is a real place - not a postcard'
In my book The Scottish Clearances:A History of the Dispossessed 1600-1900 (Penguin pbk 2019) I argued that much the more fundamental engine of population decline and out-migration in the nineteenth century was the exodus from the Highlands, as elsewhere in rural Scotland, to the towns and cities of the Lowlands, because of the new and massive concentration of urbanisation and industrialisation expanding across the Forth-Clyde valley and beyond.
Simply put, it was the availability of work, a veritable explosion in job opportunities, coinciding with rising rural population and the the threat of unemployment rather than clearance, which drew people south in ever-increasing numbers.
The old rural-urban migration continues to this day.
That is where commonality exists between past and present, not simply in the Highlands but, with only some exceptions, in the movement from country areas, villages and small towns across Scotland.
Urbanism offers jobs, higher and further education, entertainment, social interaction, leisure facilities and social ‘buzz’.
These have long proved irresistible for generations of young people from country areas not only in Scotland but across the world.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel