A construction giant has outlined why it plans to demolish a building on a historic city site to make way for student flats.
It comes as a panel of design experts said the argument for demolition requires "further consideration", and after one sector veteran cautioned over the future of the office estate.
Balfour Beatty Investments, owned by Balfour Beatty plc, has this week lodged plans with JM Architects for the demolition of the former Scottish Law Commission on Causewayside in the Scottish capital, for accommodation for 174 students.
It raises the question again of whether we can save more empty buildings. In Glasgow, where there are two million square feet of vacant office space, there is a will to find a solution to bring empty city centre behemoths back to life, but little in the way of means.
Separately, one Scottish capital-based expert, Alasdair Steele of Knight Frank, earlier called for consideration of balance on the office market, which he described as being one of the sectors hardest hit by the barrage of challenges brought forth since Covid hit.
The brutalist former Royal Bank of Scotland complex on Edinburgh’s Dundas Street is now no more, making way for the £250 million New Town Quarter, with 350 homes and a hotel included in the offering.
Up the hill on Princes Street plans for the "total demolition" of a former Next store and offices as part of the £100m Roby Hotel development are under way.
The Edinburgh Urban Design Panel, which guides on planning issues and includes representatives from heritage bodies such as the Cockburn Association and Edinburgh World Heritage Trust, said of Causewayside: "The case for demolition needs further consideration."
The historic site dates beyond the 16th century, and later was home to the Causewayside School, which was demolished in 1966 and the existing structure built.
Balfour Beatty cited issues including the bespoke nature of the existing structure, adding the manufacturer and exact detailing of the prestressed concrete floors are currently unknown, and while its reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (RAAC) construction inspection was non-invasive it placed the risk at medium level.
The developer said: "A significant number of challenges have been identified and would have to be overcome in order to keep the existing construction and adapt it into the proposed student accommodation. It would also be likely that a significant amount of carbon would be incurred through the redevelopment and adaption of the existing building with no guarantee that the carbon emissions would be lower than a new build development."
Elsewhere this week, business editor Ian McConnell casts a critical eye across the economy and writes: "It was difficult to know quite what to think about the UK Government proclaiming between Christmas and New Year that it would be using the country’s ‘Brexit freedoms’ to enable ‘pints’ of wine to be stocked on Britain’s shelves for the ‘first time ever.
"A few things came swiftly to mind."
Deputy business editor Scott Wright highlighted a clutch of top hospitality closures in his column - "The festive season was brought to a shuddering halt when several high-profile operators took to social media to announce the closure of their ventures."
Back to bricks and mortar, business correspondent Kristy Dorsey writes that property management company Taylor & Martin has launched a campaign to make it easier for tenement owners to switch providers if they want better service for their homes.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel