I am grateful to Scotland in Union for submitting freedom of information requests which show that just £3.5million has been spent by the Scottish Government on independence preparations since September 2021 (“Ministers defend £3.5m spending on independence bid”, The Herald, December 29). This is extraordinarily good value. It amounts to just 64p for every person in Scotland!
Moreover, as The Herald article explains, this includes the Scottish Government’s papers “Building a New Scotland” (nine so far) setting out the vision for independence, the legal costs of exploring whether the Scottish Parliament could itself legislate for a referendum, the costs of the minister for independence, and all the civil servants supporting these initiatives.
This is a tiny sum to spend on a major policy of working towards independence, a policy which is now supported by more than half of Scottish voters.
It would be interesting, for comparison, to know how much resources the Scottish Government has spent over the same period on all the measures needed to keep Scotland operating with the constraints imposed by the UK Government under the current devolution arrangements, costs which Scotland would of course avoid if we become independent. My impression is that those costs would be massively more than 64p per person.
Gareth Morgan, Dunbar
A resolution for the SNP
With a New Year upon us, when traditionally resolutions are made, may I make a suggestion?
I would respectfully suggest that the SNP turn over a new leaf and after 16 years of subterfuge, cover-up, and possibly much worse, that they resolve to be honest and transparent, truly transparent, in everything they do. No more ‘’cannot recall’’ or ‘’minutes weren’t taken’’, or the kids did it, or important whatsapp and text message deletions.
This dramatic change in their approach might win them admirers and reinstate their cause as being not fatally flawed. They may even attract a few more intellectually equipped and honest and straight candidates for office.
This about-turn will certainly not win them the next election after all that has happened, but it may be that some will remember the SNP years with a lot less distaste than they do at present.
Alexander McKay, Edinburgh
Quebec is not the same
Andy Maciver (“Where next for Scottish politics?”, The Herald, December 29) suggests that the “moribund” cause of independence may go the same way as it has in Quebec. He fails to mention that Quebec is part of a federation, in which provinces, great and small have equal constitutional status.
Scotland, however, is a mere DA (devolved administration), part of a unitary state in which the government of England and the government of the UK are one and the same. Nor has Quebec been forced out of the European Union in a hard Brexit, which its electorate did not vote for.
John Coutts, Stirling
Read more: Letters: Inquiry focus should be on pinpointing the source of Covid
Look to our neighbours
AS a new year dawns, Scotland is in deep trouble. After years of an ailing economy, relentlessly increasing numbers of Scots reported as living in poverty (more than one million in 2023), and further deep cuts coming to our social services, we have been failed by incompetent politicians and chaotic governments in both Edinburgh and London. And with the planned closure of the major national industrial infrastructure at Grangemouth in 2025, there is no prospect of any improvement to this grim state of affairs in 2024 or beyond.
Despite media attempts to persuade us otherwise, even the dogs in the street know that the expected election of Keir Starmer’s “business as usual” Labour party will result in little or no material change to these dire circumstances. Poverty, austerity and distress are now widespread and normalised across the UK. Anyone expecting significant growth from a UK economy marooned outside the European single market is flogging a dead horse.
But a quick glance around Scotland’s neighbourhood in north-west Europe reveals that these circumstances are not in fact normal. We are surrounded by prosperous, successful and progressive near-neighbours. Denmark, Norway, Iceland and Ireland were all in the top 10 wealthiest countries in 2023 (GDP per capita); the UK is down at number 18.
High-tax Denmark and Iceland were in the top three happiest countries in 2023, when social and health wellbeing factors were considered alongside economic; and Ireland established its own national sovereign wealth fund in 2023, to protect the long-term future of its citizens.
The contrast with our near neighbours is stark and clearly illustrates Scotland’s predicament and powerlessness under its current political and economic position. More of the same in 2024 Scotland?
D Jamieson, Dunbar
Message for a former Yes voter
I was surprised and a little saddened by the letter from former Yes voter Eileen McAuley (Letters, January 2). She seems to have fallen for the No propaganda that a vote for independence is a vote for perpetual SNP government.
An independent Scotland would have a government of whatever hue the electorate chose, rather than being lumbered with that elected by the voters in England using the grossly unrepresentative first-past-the-post system.
The current UK Government, which can ram through any legislation, “scrutinised” by the unelected, overblown and sycophantic House of Lords, is the perfect example of why Scotland needs independence.
David Hay, Minard
A dose of common sense please
Oh, how I agree with the psychiatrist who says that people are being referred for “normal human emotions” (The Herald, December 30).
I have said many times to people “that’s life, you just need to get on with it.” Problems at work, problems at home, problems with family and relationships: these are not “mental health issues” but, unfortunately, people are running to doctors and being prescribed anti-depressants and other drugs when what they need is a reality check and a good dose of common sense.
The other day I watched a news programme where primary schoolchildren were talking about their “mental health”. They’re kids for goodness sake, where did they get that phrase from? Is everything to be medicalised and treated nowadays? Taking pills will not solve life’s problems.
A can-do attitude, which is what I and my generation were brought up with, is needed. No, it’s not “tough love”. Anytime I said to my mother “Oh, I can’t do that” she would say “of course you can, just get on with it.” May I say that down-to-earth attitude has stood me in good stead for 70 years now.
Dorothy Connor, Rutherglen
Thinking of going electric? Don’t
We really must all make a New Year resolution to be nicer to the owners of electric vehicles. Grants for EVs have ended for those costing over £35,000. Free electricity is no longer available at railway stations and in local authority car parks. Some insurance companies are charging £1,000 a month.
No one wants to purchase a used EV. Unreliable recharging infrastructure. EVs stuck in snow or traffic jams have run out of electricity. EVs have a low trade in value. EVs’ lithium batteries can go on fire. In Europe, EVs have been banned from underground car parks.
A tip for those thinking of buying an EV. Don’t. People can continue to buy a petrol/diesel car until the 2035 cut-off date. Not saving the planet? Well since there are 1.474 billion cars in the world and only 33.2 million in the UK, a few EVs will make no difference especially since, as was shown at COP28, other countries are ramping up their greenhouse gases and have zero intention of ramping down.
Clark Cross, Linlithgow
Read more: SNP must stop wasting our money on unattainable indy
Lessons from 100 years ago
This time of year is when time capsules are the vogue. Seeing ones from 100 years ago should, perhaps, cause us to stop and reflect on what people 100 years from us might think of us.
Mis-use of social media; lack of respect; growing divide between excessive rich and desperate poor; demanding Israel stop collateral damage to civilians in a “just” action to secure safety, while remaining silent as Russia targets civilian infrastructure without “just” reason? Of course there are good things and inspiring people, but we are surely accountable for our own actions and inactions.
James Watson, Dunbar
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel