I’LL join anyone in criticising this Government’s dreadful record on education. I went to a newly-rebuilt "problem" high school that was already falling apart and which my local authority did not even deem worthy of a permanent head teacher during my senior phase. With all of this, during a pandemic and helping my disabled mother navigate countless DWP quagmires, I have a lot to be angry about with this Government's education policy.
Unfortunately, Carlos Alba’s article ("Middle-class and private school pupils are missing out on top universities", The Herald, December 27) misses a lot of the problems that we have in higher education, particularly at top universities such as the one where I study, the University of Edinburgh.
Mr Alba uses his piece to spread the myth that the middle class and privately educated are "missing out" on top universities. But the truth is that they always were - and frankly, still are - widely over-represented at top universities. And it is not just Edinburgh. Nearly 40% of students at both Durham University and St Andrews University were privately educated.
In so many of our key national problems, we are stuck because politicians and commentators are too busy warring over middle-class voters. From that war, we get bad policy and commentary. For instance, we have the council tax freeze which cuts services that poorer communities need to please that middle. Indeed, another example could be the dubious headline on Mr Alba’s article that private school pupils are missing out on top universities, which completely misses the key crises in higher education: low pay for academics and the student housing crisis, which are ignored as they do not seriously affect the middle-class.
It’s high time Scotland got honest with itself. Is the social contract that we supposedly have in this country one between the Government and all the Scottish people or just merely the middle and upper classes?
Michael Heffernan, Wishaw.
Read more: Middle class and private school pupils pay price
Key flaw in McArthur bill
DENIS Bruce (Letters, December 26) puts his finger on the key flaw in Liam McArthur’s proposed Assisted Dying (Scotland) Bill. The proposal completely alters the relationship between our doctors and their patients. And it alters it in a way that affects not just individuals but the whole of society.
The bill proposes that doctors (and others who are inevitably implicated, such as pharmacists) take practical steps to aid and abet people to kill themselves. As a society we judge that killing is morally wrong. To involve others - whether healthcare professionals or family or the personnel in an "end of life" clinic - in deliberately ending life is immoral, and in this country currently illegal.
One of Mr Bruce’s concerns is that medical staff and other healthcare professionals will become "inured" with the passage of time. He’s right to be concerned. In Canada the number of people who committed suicide with the practical assistance of medics rose from 1,000 in 2016 to more than 10,000 in 2021.
There are three sources that can account for that: an increase in medics who are prepared to collude with and collaborate in persons killing themselves, an increase in members of the public who see medics as prepared to collude with and collaborate in them killing themselves, and courts of law which pass flawed legislation that breaks the social contract, "You shall not kill".
The words of Councillor Eileen McCartin, MBE, which you published on your Letters Pages on January 7, 2022, are as valid as ever: "If you want to commit suicide, so be it... but don’t ask anyone else to do it for you, and wrap up the actions in words which pretend it is something else."
David Kennedy, Glasgow.
Don't blame the volcanoes
ALEXANDER McKay (Letters, December 28) asks how the recent Sundhnúkur eruption in Iceland compares to annual UK emissions. I haven’t found a published estimate for that specific eruption, but the US Geological Survey puts annual volcanic emissions around an average of 0.3 gigatons per year, with a range of plus or minus 50% each year. With around 1,500 active volcanoes, they average 200,000 tonnes each. If we assume all the volcanic emissions only come from 50 or so of those volcanoes that are erupting at any given time, we get 6 megatons (Mt) per active volcano, per year.
UK territorial emissions (without adjusting for imports, shipping, aviation), were 417Mt in 2022. So for just an hour of an average eruption, the UK emits the same amount of CO2 in under two-millionths of a year, or more precisely a little under 52 seconds. Accounting for our imports etc cuts this even further. The average active volcano has comparable emissions not to the UK, but to the smaller wards of Edinburgh City Council, or a capacity attendance at Tynecastle.
If everyone signed up to the net zero target of January 2050, and the world made linear progress towards it, volcanic emissions would only exceed human emissions in late October 2049.
Or for a completely different perspective, the UK Emissions Trading Scheme price puts the cost of reducing UK emissions at £43.60 per tonne. How much would it cost to stop a volcano from erupting?
Alan Ritchie, Glasgow.
Read more: Cuts to police numbers are hampering efforts to improve road safety
In defence of predators
CLARK Cross (Letters, December 28) proudly boasts that he has a Larsen trap set up in his garden and his comment “happy hunting in 2024” suggests that he is gleefully looking forward to trapping and killing magpies.
Magpies and songbirds appear to coexist happily in my garden and have done for the 28 years that I have lived here. In all those years I have seen no reduction in songbird numbers. The number one predator in my garden is the sparrowhawk. I wonder if Mr Cross would advocate trapping and killing them? As a bird lover I enjoy all species equally and do not believe that any human being should have the right to decide which ones live and which ones die.
Mr Cross says “watching a magpie rip a chick to bit bits is not a pretty sight”. Watching a lion rip a wildebeest to bits is arguably an even more disturbing sight but I am sure that most people would be horrified at any suggestion that lions should be trapped and killed.
Many birds and animals prey on others, are we to eradicate all predators from the face of the earth?
David Clark, Tarbolton.
Salute a great Scot
YOUR eulogy of Dr Donald Currie Caskie ("Remember when... we honoured the Tartan Pimpernel", The Herald, December 28) brought to my eyes tears of admiration for his indomitable courage in saving thousands of allied servicemen from Nazi-occupied France as the "Tartan Pimpernel".
We should salute him as one of the truly great Scots in the history of our nation.
Charles Wardrop, Perth.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here