The state of Scotland’s ferry services has long been a bone of contention with our readership, particularly with regard to the performance of Caledonian MacBrayne.
There have been some who have been hoping that the west coast network could be broken up when the next set of contracts are awarded in September next year, but last week we noted that it seems probable that Calmac will receive a direct award.
Read Martin Williams' report here 👈
Today, a reader expresses his dismay at the news.
James Bishop of Gigha, Isle of Lewis writes:
"The possible decision that CalMac may be allowed to continue its dysfunction to the inhabitants of the Western Isles is appalling.
Fiona Hyslop suggests this would be a "catalyst for positive change". One wonders quite what parallel universe Ms Hyslop exists in. She has clearly not had to rely on the abject failures and pricings of this woeful organisation. Penalties and conditions will not spur CalMac to energise sloth, inability and financial ineptitude. Whatever the facts (which will never be known, there being too much vested interest) CalMac has been a beacon to abject failure with apparently no embarrassment to the inconvenience (at least) caused to the Western Isles and elsewhere. The Corran ferry fiasco is but one example of complete inability.
There has to be a proper tender and serious conditions set out in the tender document.
If the hand of government is anywhere near the wheel, further failure looms for those needing ferry services.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel