Ash Regan is no stranger to headlines. She made them when she rebelled against the Scottish Government’s Gender Recognition Reform Bill, when she stood for the SNP leadership and, most recently, when she defected to the Alba Party.
Today she comes in for stinging criticism from one of our readers.
Robert Menzies of Falkirk writes:
"I have long been intrigued by Ash Regan. Or rather, I’ve been intrigued trying to work out what she stands for. She was elected to parliament on a manifesto that included gender reform, only to storm out in protest when the parliament voted overwhelmingly in favour of this very measure.
Whilst I can understand it was a personal vote too far for her, what about the constituents she claimed to represent and who voted for that manifesto? She will no doubt assert (as she has done recently) that these same constituents were focused solely on independence. But how does that square with her previous comment that “independence cannot be a carrot deployed only to attract voters during election times”?
Perhaps she should have followed Lisa Cameron’s even more bizarre rebellion by joining the Conservatives with their new vote-winning strategy of a permanently revolving leadership. She would have probably been at home sitting beside their Scottish leader at Holyrood where she could ask the same question that she will now no doubt be asking the leader of Alba, namely: “Can you tell me where we are headed so that I can tell the press this is what my constituents voted for?”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel