Glasgow was left aghast this week as all seven of its bids for Levelling Up funding were unsuccessful.
The hugely inadequate £2.1 billion prize fund brought councils from across the UK cap in hand to the Downing Street door of their leaders, and a fraction received a share of the crumbs.
UK Government funds are finite, we know that, and doubtless some good enterprises have been supported, but a larger pot shared fairly with targeted and sometimes courageous investment would do better.
When levelling up was coined, it surely was not envisaged as a begging bowl bidding process, where the majority end up losing out and even the winners might not be for long.
It’s also possible that some people, when they hear “levelling up”, see Prime Minister Rishi Sunak in the video the New Statesman obtained last year, in which he said: “I managed to start changing the funding formulas, to make sure that areas like this [Tunbridge Wells] are getting the funding they deserve.
“Because we inherited a bunch of formulas from the Labour Party that shoved all the funding into deprived urban areas and that needed to be undone. I started the work of undoing that.”
It was estimated bids cost about £25 million collectively.
Glasgow put in seven bids including regeneration projects in Drumchapel, Easterhouse, Maryhill and Possilpark.
“This is not Levelling Up,” Susan Aitken, the SNP leader of Glasgow City Council, said.
“It’s the exact opposite and does precisely what Rishi Sunak was caught on camera promising his base support – taking money from deprived urban areas to give to wealthy towns.
"Any claim that this process will address inequalities has been proven to be an utter sham."
READ MORE: Glasgow snubbed by Levelling Up fund as south east does 'remarkably well'
Mr Sunak defended the decision-making process and said more people in the north of England received more than those in the south-east of England per head of population.
The UK and Scottish governments are being urged to act on food inflation, still soaring while headline inflation slowed for a second month.
David Thomson, Food and Drink Federation Scotland chief executive, said: “Food and drink prices have risen for the seventeenth consecutive month, to 16.9%.
“The UK Government’s continued energy support is welcome and will help to contain food and drink price inflation.
"But there’s certainly more the Scottish and UK governments could be doing to help keep costs down for households – including by urgently simplifying current and prospective regulation.”
This includes restricting promotions of food and drink.
Also this week, business editor Ian McConnell finds some common sense on Brexit, writing: “In a world in which there is way too much pandering to ‘red wall’ voters in the north of England, it was a great relief to hear simple economic truths and common sense on Brexit from Mayor of London Sadiq Khan last week.”
A leading financial services figure in Scotland has said that the new interest rates levels emerging from the rapid rise that has been overseen by the Bank of England in recent months are here to stay, deputy business editor Scott Wright writes this week.
Elsewhere, business correspondent Kristy Dorsey reports that Scotland’s first medical cannabis production facility has secured £2 million in private investment to become one of the largest producers in the UK.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel