AGAINST my better judgement, I switched on the recent Old Firm derby. It was a couple of hours I’ll never get back.
Supporters of “provincial diddy” teams (like me) find it hard to watch a match in which we hope both participants lose. Despite the pre-match hype and the mystifying post -match description of the game as a “thriller,” it was dire, both managers having skipped the section of the coaching manual that deals with passing. preferably to someone in a jersey like your own.
There was however, something of interest in, or more accurately on, those jerseys. Both bore the names of online gambling companies. Similar branding appeared pitch-side. Additionally, betting companies fork out for television advertising before, during and after high-profile matches.
Doug Marr: Why small venues are music to my ears
Many of those adverts mislead by portraying sport-related gambling as a fun social thing, done in the company of like-minded mates. I may have missed it, but I can’t recall an advert featuring a solitary loser who has just chucked away a week’s wages. “Celebrities,” who don’t need the cash, offer a sheen of respectability to those shameless lures. “When the Fun Stops, Stop.” Don’t make me laugh.
Online gambling bosses may be many things, but they’re not daft; one reportedly “earned” £213 million in a single year. They know they are on a winner by having company names associated with professional sport, particularly football. They also have succession strategies to snare the next generation.
Go into any sport retailer and you’ll find replica kits bearing the names and logos of gambling companies. Although there are restrictions on sale of child-size kits, many youngsters sport the adult versions, advertising and all.
While some youngsters could probably name the prime minister, it’s more likely they could quote Ripyouoff.com’s odds on corners during a televised match. Online gaming also acclimatises youngsters to gambling through wheezes such as playing competitively for “skins.” I suspect many parents will have to look that up. I had.
As television advertising becomes more expensive, gambling companies seek creative and cheaper ways to hook new or returning clients. In 2021, research by Bristol University indicated around 20% of gambling premises are in the country’s poorest areas. Third party companies harvest personal data that can be used to profile those most susceptible to gambling promotions. Former gamblers and poorer people have been identified as most vulnerable to blandishments such as “free” bets.
But hold on, it’s all good, harmless fun, isn’t it? Well, it’s not. Former Arsenal and England footballer Paul Merson has gone on record about the vast sums he lost pursuing his addiction. At least Mr Merson survived to tell his tale. In September 2021, Public Health England reported over 400 annual suicides are associated with problem gambling. Gambling With Lives, a support group for relatives who have lost family members to gambling addiction, claim the real total might be as much as 650.
The UK government has long recognised the problem and a new gambling act was promised as far back as autumn 2020. As with so many things, Covid and Ukraine have been useful shields for inaction. A more likely cause is effective lobbying by the industry.
Doug Marr: We must revive optimism amongst our young people
Commendably, in the latest register of interests, no MSP has declared payment or gifts from gambling companies. Hands are not so clean at Westminster. In 2021 the Guardian reported the £225,000 in wages and freebies shared by just 28 MPs. Unbelievably, 12 months ago, a leaked draft report by an all-party group of MPs criticised reform proposals as they threatened, “destruction of one the world’s best gambling industrys” (sic). God preserve us from the worst.
Removal of tobacco and alcohol from sporting arenas was a great step forward. Similar action in respect of gambling is long overdue. It won’t be easy however, to overcome vested interests. As a minimum first step, MPs in receipt of industry largesse should be barred from any participation in debates and decisions on future changes. We are entitled to ask just where does lobbying end and bribery begin? Will we see action and reform in 2023? Don’t bet the house on it.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel