EVER since taking on my role at Glasgow Chamber of Commerce some 13 years ago, a new public transport link to Glasgow Airport has been a priority of our members.
We have watched various options for achieving what in other countries would be a fairly uncontroversial infrastructure investment come and go. The most recent proposal for a light rail metro system emerged from the 2019 report of Glasgow City Council's Connectivity Commission and has since evolved into the Clyde Metro project.
With the final publication of the Scottish Government's Strategic Transport Projects Review (STPR2) we now have confirmation of the Clyde Metro as a national priority for Scotland's transport system over the next 20 years. The sceptics tell me it will never be delivered and certainly not in time to help the city secure its 2030 net zero targets.
Glasgow City Council leader Susan Aitken established the Connectivity Commission and described STPR2 as "a significant milestone in our pledge to establish a modern, sustainable, integrated public transport system for Glasgow". She has invested political capital pushing for the Clyde Metro to be included in STPR2 as a reflection of its views and should be congratulated for getting this far. For the first time since 2007, we have a formal commitment to deliver a system that should bring a new public transport link to our airport.
The Connectivity Commission recommended that the first Metro line should connect the South Clyde Growth Corridor, namely Paisley Gilmour Street railway station to the airport and then through Renfrew, Braehead and the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital to the city centre. This corridor continues to grow; only last month Business Minister Ivan McKee welcomed the opening of the Centre for Process Innovation's £88m Medicines Manufacturing Innovation Centre as a further step in the growth of the Advanced Manufacturing Innovation District next door to the airport; a district that is destined to become a hub for several thousand new jobs.
The Clyde Metro is included in the STPR2 report as recommendation number 11 (from a list of 45) being a priority for enhancing access to affordable public transport and is justified as an answer to road congestion across Glasgow City Region. It is worth noting that the Connectivity Commission acknowledged the most challenging congestion is on the M8 west of the Kingston Bridge as it heads towards the airport.
The report specifically says that "Clyde Metro is aimed to improve connectivity with the Glasgow conurbation by providing high quality public transport links to key hubs or unserved or underserved areas". Tackling social exclusion, encouraging switching from car use and freeing rail capacity for longer-distance journeys are all outcomes that Clyde Metro is intended to deliver.
The Clyde Metro is one of the 10 projects that Glasgow Chamber of Commerce has endorsed as crucial for the city's future economic prosperity. The Chamber adopted the Connectivity Commission in full knowing that there were compromises being made with previously-held positions. We wanted to help bring the controversy over the rail link to the airport to an end and contribute to a fresh consensus on the way forward.
What the sceptics now tell me is that even if Scottish Government commitment has been secured, they don’t have the cash available to make it happen. John Swinney, it is said, will set out a Scottish budget tomorrow with very limited scope for manoeuvre and projects like the Clyde Metro could struggle to attract the financial commitments needed to make early progress. I know Chamber members would always argue that Scottish Government spending on projects that improve long term productivity should always be supported, particularly in today’s economic climate.
The good news is that there is already £140 million of City Deal funds earmarked for the airport link – this should be put to good use starting the delivery of that corridor immediately. We also have the potential of attracting private sector investment. Let’s prove the sceptics wrong and finally deliver the transport system our city must have in order to flourish.
Stuart Patrick is Chief Executive of Glasgow Chamber of Commerce
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel