Elon Musk’s recent $44 billion acquisition of Twitter ruffled many a feather on the bird app, and things have quickly gone downhill since his tenure began in late October.
A prominent free-speech advocate, the tech magnate declared “Comedy is now legal on Twitter” following his takeover. This was taken by many as a sign that no humour would be off-limits, and that Musk-era Twitter would be a haven for freedom of expression.
A noble idea on paper, but how has it played out in reality?
We’ve taken a look at some recent examples of comedy on Twitter and whether or not they were considered legal.
COMEDY: Twitter user @arb changed their profile picture to an old, unflattering photo of Musk and their display name to ‘Elon Musk (real), before tweeting: “my wife left me”.
HOW WELL DID FREE SPEECH ADVOCATE AND COMEDY SAVIOUR ELON MUSK TAKE THE JOKE?: The account has been suspended.
VERDICT: Illegal.
READ MORE: How Elon Musk could make Twitter users pay for free speech
COMEDY: Cartoonist @jephjacques used the same photo of Musk for his profile picture and changed his display name to ‘Elon Musk’. Referring to the 51-year-old’s former partner, he tweeted: “Grimes NEVER said I had a ‘weird d***’ and ‘smelled like nachos’, and if you repost this you will be arrested”.
WAS FREE SPEECH ADVOCATE AND COMEDY SAVIOUR ELON MUSK ABLE TO LAUGH AT HIMSELF? The account has been suspended.
VERDICT: Illegal.
COMEDY: Writer @ChrisWarcraft used the same profile picture currently being used by the real Musk and changed his display name to ‘Elon Musk’, before tweeting: “There is nothing better than waking up and enjoying a fresh, steaming cup of my own urine. Such a tangy way to start the day, and it’s scientifically proven to help brain cells grow. If you want to be like me, drink your pee”.
DID FREE SPEECH ADVOCATE AND COMEDY SAVIOUR ELON MUSK SEE THE FUNNY SIDE? The account has been suspended.
VERDICT: Illegal.
Comedy is now legal on Twitter
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 28, 2022
COMEDY: Mad Men actor Rich Sommer adopted the same profile picture, changed his name to ‘Elon Musk’ and fired off tweets impersonating Musk.
These included: “okay, time to employ plan b, since they’re MAKING me keep Twitter. Does anyone know any advertisers who are, like, kind of ‘into’ racism? NOT ACTUAL RACISTS!! Just ad ppl who are, y’know, curious about what it’s all about (racism)”.
HOW PLEASED WAS FREE SPEECH ADVOCATE AND COMEDY SAVIOUR ELON MUSK TO SEE JOKES BEING MADE ON HIS FREE SPEECH AND COMEDY PLATFORM? The account has been suspended.
VERDICT: Illegal.
COMEDY: Satirical Australian Twitter account @chaser changed their display name to ‘Elom Musk’.
HOW WELL DID FREE SPEECH ADVOCATE AND COMEDY SAVIOUR ELON MUSK TAKE THE JOKE? They received a message saying that their account had been temporarily restricted, on account of “misleading or confusing changes to your display name”.
As of Monday October 7, their display name is ‘Elon Musk Fondles Dogs’.
VERDICT: Illegal.
Meanwhile, Kanye West, who last month tweeted: “I’m going death con 3 (sic) on JEWISH PEOPLE” before going on to make several derogatory statements regarding Jewish people on various platforms, is back on Twitter.
READ MORE: Kanye West may be a genius but his reputation is tarnished
On Sunday, Musk tweeted: “Going forward, any Twitter handles engaging in impersonation without clearly specifying ‘parody’ will be permanently suspended”.
You might be tempted to say “This is yet more evidence that supposed ‘free speech advocates’ don’t actually mean ‘everyone should be able to say what they want’ and are really just saying ‘I should be able to say what I want’.”
Just don’t say that from an account called @ElonMuskIsAHypocrite.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel