As the French say, plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose. Here we go again. Rishi Sunak’s first scandal began the moment he stepped into the role of our third Prime Minister in three months thanks to his reappointment of Suella de Vil - sorry, I meant Suella Braverman - as Home Secretary after she had to resign from the Truss government over a serious security breach. We’re back to square one. It’s the same as Johnson and Truss: perpetual scandal standing in the way of any hope of good governance.
The notion that Sunak is ‘the adult in the room’ - as the right-wing press repeats endlessly - is nonsense. He’s as much a chaotic child as his two predecessors. The only difference is Sunak can tuck his shirt in and he’s got that corporate banker glassy calm which the markets love.
Read more: Rishi Sunak denies COP27 dodge is 'massive failure of leadership'
It’s not just scandal, however, which shows we’re in for Chaos Mark III, it’s the dangerous positioning Sunak is taking too. He’s refused to go to the world climate summit Cop27 - despite the United Nation’s warning the planet is heading for assured disaster. Truss was accused of ‘ordering’ King Charles to stay away from the summit. So British leadership will be noticeable by its absence.
The Braverman fiasco gives a clear indication of what to expect from Sunak’s administration. Sunak reappointed her Home Secretary six days after she had to resign when it emerged she’d shared sensitive information using her private email address with Tory MP John Hayes. Braverman tried to copy in Hayes’s wife but mistakenly sent the email to a staff member working for another backbencher - who then told the chief whip about the breach. Officials decided the ministerial code was broken.
Get this analysis directly to your inbox by signing up to The Herald's political newsletter, Unspun, for unrivalled political analysis in your inbox every weekday at 7pm.
It’s been reported Braverman leaked top secret plans about cutting Britain’s deficit - information referred to as “incendiary” and “market sensitive”. Contrary to claims that Braverman came forward to admit the breach, it’s been said she only owned up when she was confronted with the evidence. This appears to contradict Sunak’s version of events.
Questions have also been raised over whether the Home Secretary has the trust of MI5. Braverman was reportedly part of a leak inquiry that raised “concern” in the Security Service while she was attorney general. Look, the woman has the nickname ‘Leaky Sue’ in Whitehall, which is hardly a sign she’s to be trusted.
The simple truth is that Braverman was appointed by Sunak to assure his coronation. She’s from the hard right of the party and he needed that caucus onboard in his bid for leadership.
So what matters more to Sunak? Party or country? Party clearly. And is this a man of sound judgement? A ‘safe pair of hands’? Hardly.
Yet if Braverman shows that Sunak is just another chaotic Johnson, careening around Number 10, propping up scandal-hit ministers he should sack, then the PM’s decision to snub Cop27 reveals a man unfit to lead in these times. Even Truss planned to attend.
Read more: Has the new PM got an upwsing in the polls?
The UN has just warned that failure by governments around the world to cut greenhouse gas emissions will lead to global heating of 2.5 degrees - far above the 1.5 degree level needed to stave off catastrophe. Just a handful of countries have strengthened their commitments - despite all the promises made at Cop26. The dogs in the street knew the Glasgow summit was a charade - now we’ve proof.
So unlike consecutive leaders of the Tory Party, let’s try and be adult about what’s going on: the Sunak government is the same cabinet of clowns that we had with the last two bozos in Downing Street. That’s the harsh truth.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel