SEISMIC times bring seismic changes. We’re now getting to a stage in British political history where it seems the chaotic present will mimic the chaotic past. In 1922, the Liberal Party began its century long decline - a diminishment the LibDems still bear today - reduced to third place behind Labour.
Previously, the Liberals swaggered and enjoyed thumping government majorities, taking nearly 50% of the vote in 1906.
But scandal and ineptitude saw them banished to the political wilderness. Ring any bells? There’s every likelihood the Tories are about to tread the same sorry path as the party of Asquith and Lloyd George.
Here’s the astonishing facts as they now stand: Labour has at least 28 points lead in the polls.
If an election was held tomorrow, by some estimates the Tories would lose about 300 seats, and be left with just 22 MPs. That would see Labour all-powerful in government, and - incredibly - the SNP would become the official opposition in the House of Commons as the second largest party, with Conservatives in third place.
Now mull that - and its possible consequences - over for a moment. Of course, there’s desperate Tories, clinging to their shredded battle standard, who believe bringing in Rishi Sunak (the multimillionaire ‘safe pair of hands’) as Prime Minister, or returning the sleaze and scandal-stained Boris Johnson to power, will somehow save them from oblivion. It’s hard to see how Sunak can cure what ails the Tories - and even to many Conservatives, Johnson spells death.
To read the rest of this analysis, sign up to The Herald's political newsletter, Unspun, for FREE and get unrivalled political analysis in your inbox every day at 6pm.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel