THANK god for Liz Truss is all I can say. If she hadn’t thrown Kwasi under the bus I’m sure I’d have been the subject of even more headlines this week.
But I know you want to know what was in my head when I was sent out for Nicola’s messages, to go to the shops that is the Supreme Court in London and say, "I’d like a large slice of Scottish independence referendum, please?"
Well, as a lawyer who is employed by the Scottish Government as Lord Advocate and a government member, you will appreciate, I can’t offer a straight answer. But I can say that my postman dad often warned me when you take a message sometimes a dog will bite you.
Anyway, you know I had already said to the First Minister that I felt that the chances of another referendum being lawful without Westminster consent were as likely as Liz lasting beyond Christmas, that I didn’t have the necessary degree of confidence that it would be within the competence of the Scottish parliament.
So, then I’m having to say to the Supreme Court "Give us the vote, because it won’t necessarily lead to independence. Please. And Nicola has told me to tell you that it would just be advisory, and the law would not trigger any particular outcome."
And that’s when they laughed at me. "Are you having a laugh, Dorothy? Nicola will take Scotland out of the union faster than her fitba team's left the Champions League," Sir James Eadie’s eyes seemed to be saying to me, even if his actual words said worse; "Procedural incoherence." Oh dear.
That’s why I did sound emotional. And no, you didn’t hear me mutter the line from Elvis Costello’s Oliver’s Army, "And I would rather be anywhere else, but here today", although between you and me I may have been thinking that.
What I did say, several times, was "This is so unfair." Now, you can interpret that as you like. Was I saying I thought James Eadie’s argument was unfair, even though I admit it made a lot of sense – or was my subconscious talking about how I had been placed in an invidious position in the first place by the Scottish Government?
But then, I knew I was in for a tough time. I knew this was most likely a lost cause, that the Supreme Court will take months to decide and then determine that Scotland already is a sovereign democracy – then issue a finding saying, essentially, that we are onto plums. Which may – or may not – be actually what Nicola hopes to hear - which can then give her the chance to go all de facto.
Anyway, I’m glad it’s over. And the next time Nicola asks me to go a message I’ll just say, "I’m busy."
As imagined by Brian Beacom
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel