GORDON Brown is assuredly a good man, probably the most decent, most moral, politician of the 21st century. So, his thoughts are always welcome, always interesting, always worth careful consideration. It’s saddening therefore that his current intervention on the UK’s future comes so very late in the day.
We’ve just had a sneak peek at a leaked draft of Brown’s constitutional review. It looks like devolving more economic powers is on the table, as is overhauling parliamentary standards. Good stuff. There’s replacing the House of Lords with an upper house of nations and regions - a great idea - and a citizens jury scheme for complaints about MP ethics. A marvellous suggestion.
The SNP’s dismissal of Brown’s review as “vague and flimsy” is dim-witted and flat-footed. It’s a leaked draft, for pity’s sake, and what’s there matters. Unsurprisingly, it’s puerile political point-scoring rather than engagement.
But here’s the real problem regarding the Brown review: if this had been put forward in 2014 or 2015, then it would have been a game-changer. But it’s just too late now - and the reason it’s too late strikes at the very heart of where the independence debate has shifted.
Until perhaps a year ago, the economic factors used by unionists to knock down independence had real bite. They mattered. Moderate, considered Yes voters, and undecideds, felt the risk often outweighed the gamble. Can that be said anymore?
Economically, Britain is a failed basket case, friendless on the world’s stage. We’re heading for social disaster this winter with millions thrusts into the depths of Dickensian poverty. People will die thanks to the ruthless, cruel dogma of Tory ideologues.
To read the rest of this analysis, sign up to The Herald's political newsletter, Unspun, for FREE and get unrivalled political analysis in your inbox every day at 6pm.
Our columns are a platform for writers to express their opinions. They do not necessarily represent the views of The Herald
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel