GLASGOW famously loves a friendly rivalry.
Rival gangs targetting high end sports cars may seem same old, same old for the city. But this time, it's rival gangs attempting to be a force for good.
Starting in the UK, the climate activist network Tyre Extinguishers has now spread around Europe and across to the US.
In the dead of night, members of the grassroots network deflate the tyres of SUVs using lentils to force open valves and allow air to slowly escape. They claim this direct, individual action causes no harm beyond inconvenience to the owners of these vehicles and a public shaming.
This week, the group claimed a record number of cars targeted in one night - some 600 at various towns and cities across Europe.
In Glasgow, you might have your vehicle meddled with by a Tyre Extinguisher member or by the Deflationists. Members of the groups claim to be "holding the rich to account".
Which will be a surprise to many of the owners of these vehicles who likely regard themselves as comfortably middle class, rather than rich.
That's the thing about this sort of action: it takes one marker and uses it as a homogenous symbol, excusing the targetting of individuals.
READ MORE: This Glasgow school bike bus is the future we need to see
Each of these individuals will have their own reasons - or excuses, if you're so inclined - for owning an SUV. This sort of action is unlikely to prompt sober reflection of car ownership choices; it's more likely to prompt fury and increased denial about the impact of those choices.
Will they sell their cars? Probably not. Will consumers who are so-inclined be put off buying SUVs? Probably not.
It's a talking point, though, and a way of forcing discussion.
Denial and excuses for individual choices are really a luxury we've long since been unable to afford.
The conservative maxim of personal responsibility should have taken a hammering during the pandemic as the necessity of collective responsibility and community duty became clear.
Now, during the cost of living crisis, it becomes nonsensical. The hole in political leadership is being filled by journalist Martin Lewis and food writer Jack Monroe.
This Morning is running spin-the-wheel competitions with paid energy bills as the prize. Charities are pivoting to offering warm spaces for people to gather in.
The energy crisis and the environmental crisis are intricately interwoven and people are becoming sick to the back teeth with the word "crisis".
In the face of fuel bill terror, new prime minister Liz Truss wants to frack our way to safety. A champion of indecision, Truss has reneged on her campaign pledges and is instead offering an energy bill freeze, which is needed but is also a short term stop gap, rather than any meaningful solution.
More than one million people will likely not be able to pay their fuel bills from next month and millions more will be pushed into fuel poverty,
Working, earning, normally financially comfortable people who never thought they would be affected by money worries will be worried indeed.
Fear, genuine fear, of going without, of eating through savings, of plunging living standards, is about to become reality.
This has prompted calls for direct action. Don't Pay UK wants people to refuse to pay their energy bills, in the manner of the rent strikes of 1915 Glasgow, or, to be a bit more current, the 1980s poll tax protests.
Don't Pay UK has had ample publicity but hasn't gathered the expected traction. While it has surpassed its fundraising goals, it aimed for one million pledges of action by October 1 - a mass cancelling of direct debits - but currently has around 140,000 signatures.
Direct action asks a lot of its activists. For the Tyre Extinguishers, interfering with property could lead to a tussle with police, although the movement insists what it's doing is not against the law.
It's a lot to ask, that customers risk being cut off by their energy companies. While we might not be able to afford to put the heating on, it's preferable to have the option.
READ MORE: As leadership fails there's no guard against bad news
They may be put on to pre-payment meters, which can be difficult to come back off. Damage to credit scores is another possibility, though less serious.
Will Liz Truss's energy pledges be enough to sway people away from refusal to pay? Or will it spur more to sign up to direct action.
There's a deep sense of agitation. The recent strikes in a variety of industries are in part prompted by workers exhausted from the pandemic and believing that they should be duly rewarded for their efforts. "A slap in the face," was how one union shop steward described to me the initial 2% pay increase offered by Cosla to local authority staff.
It was a sense of indignation and fury that led to people to vote to walk out. Now we have wave after wave of union announcements of threatened industrial action.
At the same time, we have a Conservative government reluctant to hold meaningful conversations about energy and climate; a Conservative leadership that treats net-zero legislation with a patronising pat on the head.
But now a confluence of pressures are compelling a groundswell of direct action, pushing for radical movement and more carrot, less stick.
The actions of Vladimir Putin will force the UK, and Europe, towards net zero in a way that COP26 and COP27 could never do. Ditto inflation and crippling fuel bills.
READ MORE: Only children are weird, yes, but so are you
This is the rock bottom and voters are fed up of broken promises, u-turns and cans being kicked well along roads.
Single issues - cars, fuel bills - don't political consensus make. But serious agitation on multiple fronts could force wider change.
Unless there is revolutionary, rapid change, all we can expect is much broader deflation, both literally and figuratively.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel