I REMEMBER vividly the time when the now-former Chancellor Rishi Sunak declared his intentions around the Kickstart scheme. Following the announcement in his summer statement, the £2 billion programme was a bid to kickstart the economy and the careers of thousands of young people who might otherwise have been left behind as a result of the pandemic’s impact.
As part of a review process at the end of last year, questions have been asked about its success. At the start of this year, 120,000 jobs had been created rather than the intended 250,000, with a forecast of around 168,000 jobs likely to be realised as the programme draws to a close this autumn – albeit absorbing only £1.3bn of the intended budget allocation. It is easy to see how holes can of course be poked at this at a macro level, however there have been so many benefits for the intended audiences at an individual and local level.
The scheme was set up at the outset of the pandemic when it was feared that youth unemployment would more than double. Use of intermediaries, or what later became gateways, created an infrastructure of approved hubs across the country to ease engagement of local business and young people for placements both from an administrative and a practical level. Local authorities and chambers of commerce were considered key to this ambition.
Glasgow Chamber of Commerce was quick to respond, using our insights and experience from more than five years of delivering the highly successful Scottish Government-funded Developing Young Workforce programme, working to build links between industry and education.
Throughout our time working on the Kickstart Scheme, the team were inundated with enquiries from businesses looking to get involved. In total, through the support from Glasgow Chamber, over 260 businesses were supported to create some 900 new Kickstart roles for young people. There was certainly appetite although this was culled as the programme was closed earlier than anticipated. However, 565 young people were funded in a Kickstart work placement and the feedback from employers and young people has been extremely positive.
Straight up, businesses were able to experience a "try before you buy" advantage through the fully subsidised role which helped confidence at a time of great uncertainty. In addition, the scheme offered a grant for each placement to receive intensive support which was tailored for the needs of each role. Glasgow Chamber designed a unique wraparound service with some of our members and city partners offering dedicated packages of support that included mentoring and industry-related training which really enhanced the experience of the young people during the course of their time in situ. It added qualifications and certificates to their CV, arguably giving them a better chance of longer term or future employment.
The Chamber organised more than 95 different training courses for young people to participate in during their time in a Kickstart role. This combined approach increased the young person’s knowledge in relation to their job role also helping business productivity, with support including employability training delivered by mentors from partner organisations such as Jobs and Business Glasgow and Progressive Pathways. This dedicated support was paramount with more than 70% of young people moving on to a positive destination after their Kickstart placement.
The gateway model approach delivered through the Kickstart Scheme is an interesting Government concept to scale, at pace, any new programme roll-out to tackle pertinent issues. Now that the mechanism has been established let’s learn and build from that. The next problem to solve is net zero business engagement, supporting placements with a similar model to accelerate business change and at scale – particularly to SMEs who will be key to generating solutions including those around digital innovation and circular economy models. Perhaps our governments can consider the benefits of working across the British Chamber of Commerce-accredited network learning from the Kickstart scheme model to do just this.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel