IT’S perhaps a symptom of the SNP’s growing estrangement from reality, after so long in power, that Ian Blackford remains in his position as leader of the party at Westminster.
Blackford's handling of the scandal surrounding the party’s former chief whip, Patrick Grady, making unwanted sexual advances to an SNP staffer, has been reprehensible. That Nicola Sturgeon hasn’t yet forced him to resign or simply sacked him speaks to failings in her leadership.
The SNP is a party which has made much of its claim to stand ‘on the right side of history’ when it comes to sexism, sexual harassment and the need to respect all victims. The words no longer match the reality. The party now has a long and ugly history of senior members behaving in repugnant ways to those less powerful.
The slithering politicking around the Grady scandal is beneath contempt. The victim of Grady’s behaviour has been treated appallingly. He is currently off work and says he cannot return to his job while Blackford and Grady remain in post. The young man deserves the full support of everyone with a conscience.
Read more: Nicola Sturgeon backs Ian Blackford over 'utterly unacceptable' leaked comments
Blackford has repeatedly compounded the victim’s distress. The victim accuses Blackford of attempting to “ambush” him after he made the complaint, by inviting him to a meeting without letting him know Grady was also going to be there.
“For three years after that,” the young man said, “he kept reappointing Patrick as the chief whip while I was working there. I had to go in every day and face him at work. It was torture. It was a living hell in that regard.”
Then leaked audio of an SNP group meeting emerged in which Blackford could be heard urging colleagues to “give as much support as possible” to Grady. Blackford later expressed his “regret” that the victim didn’t feel supported. The victim says Blackford issued a “non-apology”. Again, it’s impossible to disagree with the young man, who added that he hadn’t been told an apology was to be issued publicly. It felt like “a publicity stunt”, he said, adding Blackford “has never contacted me privately to give me a private apology”.
After the leaked recording, current chief whip Owen Thompson threatened legal action against the leaker. There were “serious questions to be answered on the legality of sharing a recording without consent”. Thompson should also consider his position.
Now, as the heat turns up on Blackford, he’s thrown Grady under the proverbial bus. While last week he urged “full support”, Blackford now says Grady should “reflect on his behaviour and where he goes from here”. Grady’s future, Blackford adds, is “a question for his constituency party” - an implication that Grady may not be reselected as a candidate.
Read more: Joanna Cherry criticises SNP's complaints system
SNP Constitution Secretary Angus Robertson said that Grady’s actions were not “career-ending”. Nicola Sturgeon says she’s willing to apologise in person to the victim, and has already given a written apology to him. She describes comments made in the recording as “utterly unacceptable”.
Blackford, with pressure mounting against him, says “if the complainant feels aggrieved, then I am sorry for that.”
It’s far too little, and far too late. This scandal isn’t just an affront due to the substance of the events and the party’s disgraceful handling of the matter; this scandal is an indication of a party deeply out of touch with public sentiment.
The SNP has lost awareness of how Scottish people live and feel. If Nicola Sturgeon wishes to do the decent thing and reclaim so much lost ground then she must tell Blackford today that if he doesn’t quit, she’ll fire him.
Get this analysis directly to your inbox by signing up to The Herald's political newsletter, Unspun, for FREE and unrivalled political analysis in your inbox every day at 6pm.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel