OUR aircraft was already beginning to taxi for take-off when the flight attendants informed us ‘the electrics’ weren’t working. This meant that there would be no in-flight entertainment on this seven-hour, transatlantic journey and that we could forget about reclining the seats. These are not insubstantial concerns on a long journey in a pressurised, intercontinental missile. But yours had more to do with what was happening inside the driver’s bit.
On an aircraft, for obvious reasons, you don’t really have the option of fight or flight when someone tells you ‘the electrics’ are malfunctioning. And so you ask, with only the slightest trace of panic, if ‘the electrics’ are working okay in the cockpit. After all, you’re basically seated only a few yards back from the driver’s seat, so it’s not unreasonable to assume that ‘the electrics’ governing your seat might also be connected to those at the captain’s seat.
You’ve only glimpsed what an aircraft cockpit looks like from disaster movies like ‘Airplane’ but they always look as though they’re absolutely hoaching with ‘electrics’.
“I suppose a personal audience with the captain is out of the question,” you inquire of the polite and helpful attendant. “For what purpose, sir,” she responds with only the slightest trace of perfectly understandable irritability.
“I’d like to ask if maybe we could pull over; stick on the hazard lights and see if we could maybe have a further chat about ‘the electrics’ situation.” You begin to experience flashes of Ted Striker, the sweating pilot on Airplane: but not in a funny way.
To read the rest of this analysis, sign up to The Herald's political newsletter, Unspun, for FREE and get unrivalled political analysis in your inbox every day at 6pm.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here