WHAT would you do if you won the lotto? It is a question that many of us have asked ourselves. Buy a big house. Fancy boat. Swanky car. Glittering jewellery. Private island. All of the above? Each to their own, I guess.
But what I really want to know is this: would you tell anyone? This tantalising quandary popped into my head in recent days with news that someone in the UK has won the £184 million EuroMillions jackpot.
That sum eclipses the previous biggest lottery prize claimed by a UK ticketholder, an eye-watering £170m back in October 2019. The lucky person chose to remain anonymous.
It also surpasses the £161m that Scots couple Colin and Christine Weir won in 2011 – the biggest winners to have gone public.
Some years ago, I was at a posh soiree and got chatting to someone who had done a brief stint working behind-the-scenes at the National Lottery, helping winners through their tentative first days as new millionaires.
Out of curiosity, I asked: "If I ever win big, what advice would you give me?" The reply was swift: "Always tick the no publicity box." That sage nugget has stayed with me.
We are all well-versed in seeing cheesy, posed photographs that show giddy lotto winners clutching oversized cheques and spraying champagne. Before the National Lottery, it used to be Football Pools winners who graced the pages of newspapers.
In 1986, a syndicate of hospital workers scooped the first £1m win on "the pools". Then there was the legendary Viv Nicholson who, after she and her husband won £152,000 in 1961, famously vowed to "spend, spend, spend" and reportedly blew the equivalent of £3.5m at today's values.
It sounded great fun, but I reckon there is a tipping point where the money becomes a burden rather than a blessing. Everyone is different. For some, £10m would do nicely. For others, anything over £100,000 could be a slippery slope to ruin.
There have been several lottery winners who have disappeared from view – only to reappear in subsequent years to recount alarmingly similar tales of caution about excess and regret. The deluge of begging letters they received. The fallouts with envious friends and family. The frittered money.
It doesn't always end that way. I am sure there are plenty of instant millionaires living their best lives and finding that having a few extra bob in the bank has changed their world for the better. But until all those ones and zeros appear in your account, do you truly know for sure?
And another thing …
IS there nothing good to watch on Netflix? Has iPlayer gone on the blink? Silly question. But how else do you explain the current obsession with celebrity court cases?
From Johnny Depp's defamation action against his ex-wife Amber Heard to the so-called "Wagatha Christie" trial – as Rebekah Vardy's libel case against Coleen Rooney has been dubbed – it feels like everyone is turning armchair juror, certainly across large swathes of social media.
The soap opera-style twists and turns of legal proceedings are for many, no doubt, a welcome distraction from the drudgery of daily life. Seeking escapism through voyeurism is nothing new, but it feels like we're reaching peak schadenfreude and I'm not sure that is a good thing.
Our columns are a platform for writers to express their opinions. They do not necessarily represent the views of The Herald
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here