I GREW up in a deaf household but it was not without music. In 1975 an allergic reaction to antibiotics lost my mum her hearing and her music collection ends abruptly.
We had a hulking old record player her flatmate's mariner boyfriend had smuggled back from Fiji on board a Royal Australian Navy ship to save them on postage.
It was a pure piece of 1970s design bringing me the sounds of Britain's swinging 60s and early 70s to a 1980s Australian outback town just off the Golden Highway.
Enya was in the charts, and Shakespeare's Sister, but I knew all the words on Tea For The Tillerman, Candles in the Rain, and everything by Creedence Clearwater Revival. Name a Beatles song and I'll recite you it rote, same for Don McLean. The soundtrack to Hair was my preference, an album my mother would hide from me but which I would find, listen to and replace before she noticed.
I saw Hair on Broadway in New York a few years ago and realised with cringing adult clarity why she might not have wanted her seven-year-old daughter singing those lyrics.
What I mean to say, though, is that, despite it seeming like it mightn't have been so, music is fundamental to all my earliest memories.
The novelist Andrew O'Hagan had a sparkling piece in the London Review of Books recently about his mother's death, technological obsolescence and the mildly infuriating stubbornness of the resolute technophobe.
"Nobody with an iPhone13," he writes, "Secretly craves an iPhone6, not even for reasons of nostalgia or perversity." Such lack of imagination.
I crave, and not secretly, my iPhone3, which I gave up in March this year. I procured a second hand iPhone12 from a friend in January and then spent nearly three months plucking up the courage to use it.
I am the literal embodiment of the vegan joke. How do you know Catriona Stewart has an iPhone3?
Because she's told you.
I loved my iPhone3. Love it still: it's sitting charged up on a shelf behind me, just in case. It merely does what is needed - showed me my emails, sent text messages and let me speak to people in other places.
At our belated work's Christmas night out I showed my Zoomer colleagues how, to take a selfie, you have to turn the entire phone around – no front facing camera here – and wish upon a star.
What might be captured in the frame is anyone's guess and part of the fun.
For music, I had my iPod Mini, which I bought in Texas in 2004 before it was launched in the UK. It started life as a curiosity piece because it was too new to be purchased here and ends its life as a curiosity piece because it is too old to be purchased here.
Just before the lockdown I was in a branch of Pret A Manger holding it in my hand and the barista, with surprised glee, asked for a look at it, taking it from my hand and turning it up to the light as though to check its grade.
My iPod mini is pink, a pallid pearlescent unique to the era. For its more modern pinks, Apple came up with punchier number, a much more forceful pop that could take out an eye.
The cover may have been insipid but the delights inside were miraculous. It served me well, that little can of tunes, but I mainly used it while commuting and when I switched from train to bike it didn't seem safe or sensible to cycle while listening to music so I slowly retired it.
Horribly, I forgot the joy of cutting about with a song backgrounding your step.
When I upgraded my phone I was worried my soul might spill out through my nostrils. Instead, all these notes are spilling in through my ears.
It is a multi-purpose rectangle that not only lets me access the internet and download apps, it lets me watch television.
Now, like God, I've got the whole world in my hands. I will admit, it came in useful for travelling to the US earlier this year because the airline mandated everything be done through an app.
I would have been digitally excluded and it would have been a pain in the neck. Other than that, I wondered what I needed this new phone for. I had buyer's remorse.
But wait. This phone also lets me listen to music, like my iPod but all of it, all the music. I bought bluetooth headphones and now my life is on a new trajectory, hurtling into 21st century life. I'm listening to all the music, all the time.
Walking along the street, I'm buoyant. I press a button and songs slither into my ears, songs I haven't heard in years but that take me to times and places in the past.
I feel like a capsizing ship. I feel like I'm sparkling. I Google, "How many openings does the human body have?" just to double check how many ways the ecstasy of sound entering me might then escape.
It's here I learn that human holes are called canals, which is fine, I've come across ear canal and birth canal before; ducts, which again makes sense, who hasn't discussed their tear ducts at some point?
They are also called meatus. Meatus? Is this the plural or the singular? What in God's name is a meatus? The quickened romance briefly slows but, never mind, I can forward the track and on to infinity.
My body is pulled apart and reassembled by the sound. I am the percussion section and the strings. My bones are laid out as a marimba and my feet are drums.
I am the star of my own musical now and I hate musicals but I love my life set to song. I try to restrain myself from dancing in the street but usually fail. A little hip bump here, a sous-sus there, a hair flick there. No one's looking.
Is it, though, better than my iPod? Apple has just announced it is to discontinue the iPod more than 20 years after it was launched and a nostalgic heart like mine skips a beat.
Even with the modern world right in my grasp, my thumb's muscle memory wants to slide around a wheel. My ears want the reassurance of familiar sounds and my brain is hobbled by choice.
I might keep on nursing the iPod Mini, at least for a little while longer. Is that nostalgia? Or perversity? It's comfort, I think. I don't need the whole world, I just need enough of it to keep me in song.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here