Now that Covid has blown itself out, perhaps we are seeing those old, familiar accoutrements of the British state and re-discovering their absurdity. The state opening of the UK Parliament and its esoteric symbolism has been with us for centuries but somehow yesterday’s ceremonials seemed uniquely ridiculous.
Was that really the Imperial State Crown – encrusted with priceless diamonds – being carried to a large black Rolls Royce on its own cushion before being driven to Westminster? Were those two royal footmen who accompanied it on its journey there to guard it from an assassination attempt or merely to mitigate the incongruity of watching an inanimate object being received like a visiting head of state?
The veneration of the queen’s ceremonial headgear could command its own spin-off, especially as Her Majesty seems to be permanently under the weather these days. “And there’s the queen’s hat,” whispers Clive Myrie, commentating for the BBC, “being presented to the assembled stars of stage and screen as they all bow and lean in close for a private word.”
And afterwards the Beeb’s royal correspondent, Nicholas Witchell might catch up with Bono and Sir Cliff Richard and ask them what the crown jewels had said to them. “I’m afraid that must always remain between me and them,” says Bono reverently.
And look, there’s a division of the Household Guard being led on a search of the cellar for any dodgy-looking Catholics that might be lurking, ready to spring out and kidnap yon crown. This is supposed to mimic the Gunpowder Plot of 1605 when a group of aristocratic Fenians had tried to blow up Parliament in a bid to stop the routine evisceration and disembowelling of their fellows.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel