THE discussion around whether or not Boris Johnson called his troublesome backbencher Tobias Ellwood a ‘c**t’ is almost chivalrously old-fashioned given that politics has now descended into a hell-scape peopled by extremists, predators, nutcases, trolls and halfwits.
Incidentally, it’s not ‘King Cnut’, Johnson is alleged to have deployed as an epithet to diss Ellwood. It’s the other c-word. Do the anagram. Johnson might like to pose as someone classically educated, but his Anglo-Saxon runs more to the anatomical than the academic.
Set against the slithering, fleck-lipped, sweaty-handed fantasies of whichever Tory MP it was who claimed Angela Rayner’s legs distracted the Prime Minister in the Commons, dropping the C-bomb is relatively minor.
Of course, it’s possible to wring humour out of such pathetic stupidity, lumpen lack of language skills, and crass sexism, but the descent of politics into the gutter is no laughing matter. Three Tory cabinet ministers reportedly face allegations of sexual misconduct. Two Labour shadow cabinet ministers have also been referred to the parliamentary watchdog, the Independent Complaints and Grievance Scheme (ICGS). Some 56 MPs are said to have been reported to the ICGS for allegations ranging from sexually inappropriate comments to claims that one MP “bribed” a staff member “in return for sexual favours”.
READ MORE: Leaders failed us over Covid - can we trust them to tackle climate change?
The stink of political rot and abuse doesn’t simply linger at national level, however. It goes all the way down, and we need only look to the forthcoming Scottish council elections – a week from today – to discover just how contemptible so many of those who would deign to represent us really are, once some digging is done.
Since January I’ve been keeping a little work file marked Gutter, which contains clippings relating to allegations levelled at Scottish council candidates from across the parties. The tally, by no means definitive, runs to 40 individuals. I’d like to list them all, providing voters a ready-reckoner for polling day, but space prevents me.
So here’s a sample of headlines and stories for your delectation.
• Convicted wife abuser to stand for Scottish LibDems
• Tory Glasgow candidate faces calls to stand down for ‘racist’ post
• SNP candidate in ‘disgusting’ anti-Semitic comment row
• Tories stand candidate with interest in KKK
• SNP candidate under fire over claims 9-11 was ‘inside job’
• SNP candidate calls Pope a ‘c**t’
• Scottish Labour candidate said SNP wanted to impose ‘Catholic Monarchy’
• Man accused of racism by Anas Sarwar to stand for Scottish Labour
• SNP race row candidate forced to apologise
• Scottish Tories suspend candidate after ‘throat-grab’ video
On it goes. That’s merely a flavour. Remember when everyone thought it was just Alba that was the dreck-magnet? Some individuals I’ve monitored have been axed as candidates, but unsurprisingly, I find it rather amusing when the oafs and knuckle-draggers – male and female – who populate Scottish politics upbraid journalists for our ‘relentless negativity’. Would they like us to celebrate disgrace?
What’s happening here? There’s evidence some parties have struggled to find candidates to stand – but a declining pool of council wannabes cannot account for the sheen of filth covering the body politic. And if you’ve only got a few apples in the barrel why pick the rotten ones?
READ MORE: We've turned politicians into petty gods
So, is this a case of the public getting what we deserve? Politics, like the media obviously, is merely a mirror which reflects back the spirit of the times.
Thirty years ago, when I was starting out in the journalism game, I had to cut my teeth as a cub reporter covering courts and councils. Back then, the traditional entry into journalism was a little like a Japanese sushi chef: you had to spend years learning to boil perfect rice before you ever got to make a fancy-schmantzy maki roll.
Covering councils is the journalistic equivalent of learning to boil rice perfectly. So I’ve come across plenty of loonies in local authorities in my time. Municipal madness is nothing new. However, the sheer scale of the creeps and goons trying to get their foot in the door of democracy in Scotland is quite staggering.
Extremism is now becoming in-built in politics. Character is no longer a requirement. Perhaps this is proof of Twitter entering the real world. Thankfully, we just have the dregs of society trying to get some seats in councils rather than scaling the walls of the Capitol Building – but then America always does lead where the rest of the west follows.
Is it perhaps the trickle-down effect of what Boris Johnson has done to politics? If there’s a lying, amoral weasel at the top of the pile, why should those on the lowest rungs give two damns about how they behave?
It all speaks of a deep cynicism within political parties. As long as they’ve people who’ll mouth the right slogans, their candidate selection procedures appear perfectly content to allow the worst of the worst to get a taste of power.
Sadly, it seems impossible not to lay blame at the door of the ‘constitutionalisation’ of our politics. Everything is now refracted through the prism of the constitution – whether it’s independence or Brexit. And the constitution doesn’t make for good everyday politics. It makes for culture wars and division over identity. It makes for people who want you to think like them, rather than people who want to make your life better. The constitution creates rabble-rousers and extremists, not community-minded public-spirited public servants who want to work hard for you and me.
Most of all, we’re seeing proof of what a bitter and mean little society we’ve incrementally but inevitably become. As long as these extremists, predators, nutcases, trolls and halfwits – whether at the local or national level – sing the ugly songs we want to hear, bang the identity drum we want to dance to, attack the enemies we want attacked, we’ll traipse off to polling booths next week and vote for them regardless.
We’re divided as a people and that’s debased us as a group. So, what can we expect from the mirror which politics holds up to our faces, but to see some awful reflection of everything that’s wrong with ourselves today?
Our columns are a platform for writers to express their opinions. They do not necessarily represent the views of The Herald
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel