SMOWT
IN the Dictionaries of the Scots Language (DSL) smowt has various meanings – the first two senses relate to fish: “a young salmon”and “a kind of trout”. The meaning I want to concentrate on is given as the third sense in DSL, “a small insignificant person; also used of animals and inanimate objects”.
Alexander Tait, in his Poems and Songs (1790), casts an acerbic eye on inbreeding “gentry”: “Our gentry now they’re a’ grown smouts, their banes so short and sma’”. Another unflattering picture comes from 1836 in Allan Cunningham’s description of a lady in his Lord Roldan: “...and her a black smout of a thing; walks intaed and has a beard”.
Referencing “inanimate objects”, DSL cites John Black’s Airtin Hame: “We taigle at anterin times ower lang Wi’ smouty and little-worth things” (1920). Insignificant things and people are both described here in this Edinburgh example from 1956: “Ye canna play wi us. Ye're juist a smowt. Have ye no got a bigger aipple? This is an awfu wee smowt”. Yes, in an Edinburgh childhood there was no greater insult than being called, “a wee smowt”.
Research at DSL has shown that the term is still widely used as, for example, in this from the Edinburgh Evening News of June 2009: “Just ’cos he’s a wee smout, dwarfed by his ten-feet-tall fiancée Sophie Dahl, doesn’t mean diminutive Jamie Cullum’s a bad person”. More recently, there is this report of a trial in Paisley from the Paisley Daily Express of October 2021 describing the rough handling of a shop-lifter: “She was a wee smout. That’s why she got rag-dolled".
Scots Word of the Week is written by Pauline Cairns Speitel, Dictionaries of the Scots Language https://dsl.ac.uk
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here