Almost all remaining legal measures to control coronavirus were lifted on Monday but for Glasgow city centre full recovery is still some way off.
When the First Minister announced that mask wearing would remain for at least a further two weeks I could sense hearts sinking amongst our city centre membership. It is not that the mask wearing itself is the issue; that is simply a minor inconvenience. Rather there is a yearning for a more confident, positive message of reopening, acknowledging the continuing risks but deliberately marking the transition to a more normal life.
It is hardly controversial to suggest that Glasgow city centre is not in great shape. There are empty units all along the central shopping routes, with Sauchiehall Street in an especially precarious condition. A handful of very prominent sites such as the former BHS and the fire-damaged O2 act as substantial blights showing no obvious signs of movement.
Argyle Street is not much better, although Drum Property Group’s Candleriggs Square development is already transforming the eastern end. Even in Buchanan Street there are empty units but market intelligence is telling us there is healthy demand, albeit supported by falling rents.
The official data suggests that city centre retail vacancies have very nearly doubled since the pandemic began but that understates the impact. Units that are no longer being offered to the market as shops, such as the former Debenhams store, are not included and many of those that are occupied are housing what might at best be described as low value operations.
The Centre for Cities high street tracker shows that Glasgow’s footfall is still well below its pre-pandemic levels, leaving the city centre in the bottom ten for recovery out of the 60 UK towns and cities being monitored. Glasgow’s overall recovery index at the end of February 2022 has now reached 91 compared to the same month in 2020. Manchester’s index is at 94 and Edinburgh’s 104.
There is a clear contrast between activity during the working week, where current experiments in hybrid working are suppressing footfall, and the much stronger recovery at the weekend, especially at night. The Centre for Cities’ February weekday index for Glasgow reached 74 – with only London in a worse position – whilst the weekend is at 132 and the night-time at 137.
The queues at the weekend outside the Theatre Royal for James McAvoy’s sold-out performance of Cyrano de Bergerac are a clear signal that we should have no fears for Glasgow’s cultural role. Nor should we worry about the prospects for food and drink. Spending last month was actually 42 per cent higher than the same month in February 2019 with pent-up demand bursting free as restrictions were lifted. Cafes, restaurants and bars have been leading the city centre’s recovery.
In stark contrast spending on fashion and more general retail including department stores is down 13 per cent and 30 per cent respectively on 2019 performance. The acceleration of online shopping habits means that we will have to look at new uses for those empty shop units.
In the long term, investments such as those proposed by Landsec at Buchanan Galleries and Sovereign Centros at St Enoch Centre will help the city adjust but the evidence is building for intervention to help convert those empty units in Sauchiehall Street and Argyle Street right now.
Stuart Patrick is chief executive of Glasgow Chamber of Commerce
Our columns are a platform for writers to express their opinions. They do not necessarily represent the views of The Herald.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel