AIRLINES, like oil and gas companies, are rightly a focus in the battle against the effects of the use of fossil fuels on our struggling climate.
A cut in Airport Passenger Duty for domestic flights from some time in 2023 was announced just before COP26 and provided Prime Minister Boris Johnson with fodder for his now forgotten headline catchphrase of the time.
It also fuelled SNP ire, with its Westminster leader Ian Blackford calling it a climate disgrace and First Minister Nicola Sturgeon also slating the move.
It was described as a step in the right direction but too little too late by the likes of Ryanair, a budget airline that has and does help link many across Europe, albeit sometimes with a bullish type of approach to which not everyone warms.
Scottish tourism leaders were less reticent about aiding in some way the rebuilding of international connectivity upon which we have relied, and Marc Crothall, of the Scottish Tourism Alliance, said that the move was a hugely positive step forward in the recovery of the Scottish travel and aviation sector.
Yet it does nothing to encourage a level of build-back that would help fund the acceleration of the development of clean-fuel aircraft.
Without doubt we need to find cleaner means of international travel as quickly as possible.
As with fossil fuels and the North Sea, until the alternatives are funded and in place the status quo cannot be abandoned regardless of consequence.
In one example of innovation, Loganair is an active partner in three future green flight projects including developing hydrogen power.
The Scottish Government aims to decarbonise scheduled flights within Scotland by 2040.
Ryanair said that UK APD is creating a direct competitive disadvantage for developing future aviation.
The sentiment was echoed by Gordon Dewar, chief executive of Edinburgh Airport, who said that so far the kind of investment Ryanair pledged this week – 10 aircraft worth $1 billion – is not being replicated.
He told The Herald: “Our governments, both Scottish and the UK, don’t seem to have understood about where we are in that recovery cycle. Not only have other countries not got that tax but they have also introduced levels of support.”
Moves like the UK Government's APD cut, its energy crisis plan of action and the state of the economy could range in description from sleight of hand to brazen kidology.
Business editor Ian McConnell says in his Called to Account column this week that “there was something in the Tory tone (and not for the first time) that seemed to indicate they viewed themselves as munificent benefactors”.
He also says the UK economic output figures came with “dizzying spin and more front than Blackpool”.
Mark Williamson opines that “the sight of the SNP Government getting a lambasting this week over the free ports issue from the Greens to whom it has pandered could have been laughable if the issues involved weren’t so serious” in his column this week.
As John Menzies finds itself at the sharp end of a takeover bid by a Kuwaiti competitor, Scott Wright says the latest news is a fresh blow.
Also this week, in what is thought to be a UK first for a craft beer brewer, reports Kristy Dorsey, Edinburgh-based Vault City toasted a move to a four-day week.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel