Opinion
By Joanne Lockwood
We want to know what our staff think of our organisation, so we carry out our employee engagement surveys on an annual basis and get somewhat useful information back – but are we really getting the insights needed to understand the pulse of our organisation?
Let’s examine some of the pitfalls that limit the effectiveness of the survey and data that is fed back. First, organisations tend to survey too infrequently. There is this myth that people suffer survey fatigue, and it will turn them off and become less useful.
To counter this view, I advocate that the problem is actually “lack of action fatigue” – if you are polling without publishing the results in a timely and meaningful way, without highlighting the actions and insights that will result, is it any wonder why people get tired of responding – what’s the point?
READ MORE: Talent of the future needs help today to find the path
Organisations must adopt a “you said, we did” mantra from both internal voices and customers. Find ways to feel the pulse daily.
Secondly, organisations shy away from collecting demographic data. What is the use of insights if we don’t know “who said so”? We may find that 95 per cent of our colleagues are satisfied, but how can we drill down on the 5% to truly understand where the areas of concern lie?
I want to know if the people who are less engaged are from marginalised communities, what their length of service is, and the department or teams they work in. Only then can I work with managers and leaders to address those concerns, adding to KPIs and performance targets to ensure it is measured and actioned.
I know that many organisations struggle to get high response levels, and many also find a lot of “prefer not to say” responses. If this is the case it is a sign to think about how the engagement survey is being positioned and communicated – do colleagues understand why it relates to them?
READ MORE: Easy, fast and personal are today's recruitment edicts
Often it is a case of building trust. This can be through employee resource groups or staff forums – but again I go back to point one – has “lack of action fatigue” set in?
And finally, are we asking the right questions? Too often I see organisations focusing on themselves, without asking the employee how they feel about key issues.
The most insightful question I have seen on an engagement survey is “I have the chance to use my strengths every day at work”, with an option to grade that from one to five. This one question tests motivation and engagement more than any number of subjective thoughts on the organisation. We should be asking our people “how they feel”, not “what they think”, types of questions.
When looking at inclusion and belonging the measurement is “feelings” – I feel engaged, challenged, and valued. How are you feeling?
Joanne Lockwood (she/her), an inclusion and belonging specialist with SEE Change Happen, is a guest writer on behalf of s1jobs.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here