PRIME Minister’s Questions was going well, or at least less badly than usual, for the PM. While not exactly subdued, the House was not as mental as of late. The main thrust of Labour opposition leader Keir Starmer had been neither parties nor Savile, J.
But, after a perfectly civilised discussion about fraud (the crime, not the Prime Minister), more bad news about parties eventually dropped – even as the PM had been speaking.
Labour’s Fabian Hamilton revealed that “in the last few minutes”, a photo had emerged of Boris in Downing Street on 15 December 2020 “surrounded by alcohol, food and people wearing tinsel”.
Tinsel. Oh dear. In such detail lies the devilry. The Mirror website’s “bombshell image” showed the PM “near an open bottle of bubbly and packet of crisps”. Crisps: it gets worse. Thus the sybaritic life of the elite.
Boris averred that Mr Hamilton was “completely in error”, though later it transpired he meant not about the party but about Mr Hamilton’s claim that the matter was not under investigation. The PM said information about it had been submitted to the police. Excellent. That’s not so bad then.
Alas, Savile’s ugly mug also came up later in proceedings, with reference to an incident outside Parliament where, echoing an unwise remark by the PM last week, an estimated one people shouted at Sir Keir about the sex beast not having been prosecuted while he was Director of Public Prosecutions.
Ruth Jones (Lab) said, that just as “careless words” from Mr Johnson had led to an extended sentence for Nazanin Zaghari-Radcliffe in Iran, the same had led to Sir Keir being “hounded by thugs outside this Parliament”. Rather than singing I Will Survive, said Ms Jones, the PM would be better singing Careless Whisper (a hit for Mr George Michael, M’lud).
The PM, in a notably silky shirt (we add by way of devilish detail), replied that Ms Jones ought not to let “the thugs and yobs who bullied and harassed the right honourable gentleman” off the hook, any more than she should let the Iranian government off the hook.
Earlier, as noted above, Sir Keir had led on the comparatively mundane matter of financial fraud. He’d heard the Business Secretary, Kwasi Kwarteng, saying fraud was not a biggie for most folk, not something “people experience in their day-to-day lives”.
Sir Keir asked about withdrawing such words, noting that, during lockdown, “two crimes that people could commit were online fraud and throwing parties”.
He added: “So far as I can see, the numbers for both of these have gone through the roof.”
Boris answered to the effect that, broadly speaking, his Government was against crime and was taking some measures against it, er, as a whole.
With the PM in a whole, Sir Keir kept digging, recalling that the PM’s anti-fraud minister, Lord Agnew, had quit after having to “smash some crockery to get people to take notice” of the problem.
As if the PM hadn’t enough on his plate, Mr Starmer brought up another scam: the so-called energy discount that was really “a dodgy loan”. Quoth Sir K: “If it sounds like he’s forcing people to take out a loan, and it looks like he’s forcing people to take out a loon” – little Freudian slop there – “isn’t it just forcing people to take out a loan?”
I should say that the effect of Sir Keir’s oratory was somewhat marred at one point by a woman directly behind his head scrolling down her phone with scarlet-painted nails, just as viewers were similarly distracted by a woman behind Boris’s left ear rhythmically scratching her thigh. Don’t they know there are cameras present?
Meanwhile, Mr Speaker had to make one of relatively few interventions this session to an unruly group to his right: “If you want to carry on, carry on outside.” That was to the Tory front bench.
It was a case of Carry On Groaning when SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford rose to ululate that the forthcoming National Insurance hike would mean a real cut in nurses’ pay.
Boris: “We value our nurses, we love our NHS.”
Ian: “Well, actions speak louder than words.” Boris thought bubble: ‘Shut up and actively sit down then. Or give us a wee Heilan’ fling.’
What the PM actually said was: “I must say I think it peculiar that, as I understand it, the Scottish Nationalist [sic] Party’s approach to health care is now to cut off the bottom of doors in schools in Scotland in order to improve ventilation.” Touché. With knobs on.
Our columns are a platform for writers to express their opinions. They do not necessarily represent the views of The Herald.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here